DMC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force

Case [2018] NSWCATAD 219


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: DMC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 219
Hearing dates: 6 June 2018
Date of orders: 18 September 2018
Decision date: 18 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member
Decision:

The decision by the Commissioner of Police to revoke DMC’s category ABC firearms licence is affirmed.

Catchwords: Administrative Law – Firearms Act - firearms licence - revocation of licence - contrary to the public interest
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Firearms Act 1996
Firearms Regulation 2017
Cases Cited: Blissett v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police; Webb Protection Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2006] NSWADT 114
Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Others (1995) 131 ALR 657
Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9
Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 16
Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRp 6; (1991) 1 VR 63
O'Sullivan v Farrer [1989] HCA 61; (1989) 168 CLR 210
Re Queensland Electricity Commission and Ors; Ex parte Electrical Trades Union of Australia (1987) 72 ALR 1
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: DMC (Applicant)
Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Borthwick and Butler, Solicitors (Applicant)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/00378315
Publication restriction: The publication of the name of the applicant, his ex-wife or his children is prohibited under section 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013

Reasons for Decision

Introduction

  1. In these reasons the name of the Applicant has been anonymised so as to preserve the privacy of his personal affairs and the personal affairs of other individuals. The Applicant is referred to as DMC. In these reasons I refer to DMC’s ex-wife and two daughters. I will refer to DMC’s ex-wife as X and his daughters as Y and Z.

  2. DMC held a category ABC firearms licence under the Firearms Act 1996 (“the Act”). In August 2017 a delegate of the Commissioner of Police (“the Commissioner”) determined to revoke DMC’s licence. That decision was affirmed on internal review.

  3. This is an application for review of the determination to revoke DMC’s firearms licence.

Background

  1. The relevant background is set out in the internal review statement of reasons. I understand that these points are not in dispute:

  1. DMC has been authorised for firearms in NSW under past and current legislation since at least 31 December 1990;

  2. DMC’s Category ABC firearms licence was first issued on 3 August 1998 for the genuine reason of Primary Production;

  3. In April 2004 police inspected DMC’s firearms safe and found an additional locking point was required on the main door;

  4. In 2010 DMC was charged in relation to allowing his nephew, who held no firearms licence, to access an air rifle registered to DMC. DMC’s licence was suspended and all his registered firearms were seized;

  5. In August 2010 DMC were found guilty…

Continue reading DMC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
DMC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 219
Case
[2018] NSWCATAD 219
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of DMC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force, involves a dispute regarding the revocation of the appellant's firearms licence under the Firearms Act. The appellant, DMC, contested the decision of the Commissioner of Police to revoke their firearms licence, arguing that it was made without lawful authority and was contrary to the public interest. The matter was brought before the court to determine the validity of the revocation decision.

The primary legal issue the court needed to address was whether the Commissioner of Police had the lawful authority to revoke the appellant's firearms licence and if the decision was contrary to the public interest. The court examined the statutory framework under which the Commissioner exercised the power to revoke the licence and the criteria that must be met for such a decision to be lawful. The court also considered the evidence and submissions presented by both parties concerning the appellant's conduct and its impact on public interest.

In its reasoning, the court found that the Commissioner of Police had the lawful authority to revoke the appellant's firearms licence under the relevant provisions of the Firearms Act. The court determined that the evidence supported the Commissioner's decision that the revocation was in the public interest, given the appellant's conduct and the potential risk to public safety. The court rejected the appellant's arguments that the decision was arbitrary or lacked proper consideration of the statutory criteria.

The decision of the Commissioner of Police to revoke DMC’s category ABC firearms licence is affirmed. The court upheld the Commissioner's decision, finding it to be lawful and in the public interest.

Orders

Orders of the court

The decision by the Commissioner of Police to revoke DMC’s category ABC firearms licence is affirmed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.