Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Partington

Director of Public Prosecutions v Partington

Case [2017] VCC 1540

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Partington [2017] VCC 1540
Case: [2017] VCC 1540
Decision Date: 23 October 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Partington [2017] VCC 1540

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Casey [2020] VCC 878

Cases Citing This Decision

Director of Public Prosecutions v Hare [2025] VCC 1657
Citation 1

…ses Cited: DPP v Eccles [2025] VCC 840; Szeto v The Queen (2012) 36 VR 47; DPP v Lumsden [2023] VCC 212; DPP v Partington [2017] VCC 1540; DPP v Dillon (a pseudonym) [2025] VSCA 266. ---…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Eccles [2025] VCC 840
Citation 2

…The Queen [2017] VSCA 118; Burgess v R [2017] VSCA 59; DPP v Williams [2016] VCC 269; DPP v Lumsden [2023] VCC 212; DPP v Partington [2017] VCC 1540; DPP v Whitcroft [2017] VCC 1712. Sentence: Four years, eight months’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years, 11 months.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Casey [2020] VCC 878
Citation 3

…Cases Cited: DPP v Toomey [2006] VSCA 90; Bromley v R [2018] VSCA 329; Buckley v The Queen [2016] VSCA 222; DPP v Partington [2017] VCC 1540 Sentence:6 years and 3 months imprisonment, non-parole period 3 years and 3 months. s 6AAA 8 years and 6 months imprisonment with non-parole period of 6 years ---…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

R v Clarkson [2024] NSWDC 283
Citation 1

…[21][2009] 1 AC 92, 108-9 [48]–[49]. See also Clarkson v R; EJA v R (2011) 32 VR 361, 370–1 [32].…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 2

…[38][2017] HCA 41…
Talbot (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2016] VSCA 218
Citation 3

…[11][2016] VSCA 218 [39] (Weinberg and Osborn JJA)…
Browne (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 274
Citation 4

…[16][2015] VSCA 274 [71]…
Sutton (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 251
Citation 5

…317, [14]–[19] (Maxwell P and Neave JA); Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 42 VR 295, 310 [83]; Sutton (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 251, [25]–[28] Maxwell P and Redlich JA.…
Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2014] VSCA 145
Citation 6

…40] (Maxwell P, Vincent and Neave JJA); DPP v TDJ [2009] VSCA 317, [14]–[19] (Maxwell P and Neave JA); Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 42 VR 295, 310 [83]; Sutton (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 251, [25]–[28] Maxwell P and Redlich JA.…
BM v The Queen [2013] VSCA 3
Citation 7

…[22] R v Khem (2008) 186 A Crim R 465, 469–70 [17]–[20] (Neave JA), 472–3 [34] (Pagone AJA); BM v R [2013] VSCA 3 [23]–[28] (Maxwell P, Whelan JA agreeing).…
Stalio v The Queen [2012] VSCA 120
Citation 8

…[36]See Stalio v R [2012] VSCA 120 [71]…
DPP v TDJ [2009] VSCA 317
Citation 9

…56] (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA); DPP v DDJ (2009) 22 VR 444, 453–454 [36]–[40] (Maxwell P, Vincent and Neave JJA); DPP v TDJ [2009] VSCA 317, [14]–[19] (Maxwell P and Neave JA); Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 42 VR 295, 310 [83]; Sutton (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 251, [25]–[28] Maxwell…
DPP v DDJ [2009] VSCA 115
Citation 10

…[12](2009) 22 VR 444…
R v DD (No 2) [2008] VSCA 15
Citation 11

…[35]See R v DD (No 2) [2008] VSCA 15…
R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
Citation 12

…[37](2007) 16 VR 269…
DPP v Toomey [2006] VSCA 90
Citation 13

…[13][2006] VSCA 90…
DPP v DAK [2004] VSCA 175
Citation 14

…997] 1 VR 242, 244 (Winneke P, Hayne JA and Hedigan AJA agreeing); R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385, 387 (Winneke P, Charles JA and Hedigan AJA); DPP v VH (2004) 10 VR 234, 237–238 [11], (Callaway JA, Buchanan JA agreeing), 241 [23] (Eames JA); DPP v CPD (2009) 22 VR 533, 546–547[54]–[56] (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson A…
R v Gregory [2000] VSCA 212
Citation 15

…[33][2000] VSCA 212…
Latrobe Country Credit Co-operative Ltd v Smith [1998] VSCA 74
Citation 16

…) 4–5 (Marks J, Hampel and McDonald JJ agreeing); R v Ware [1997] 1 VR 647, 653 (Hedigan AJA, Winneke P and Hayne JA agreeing); R v Wakime [1997] 1 VR 242, 244 (Winneke P, Hayne JA and Hedigan AJA agreeing); R v WEF [1998] 2 VR 385, 387 (Winneke P, Charles JA and Hedigan AJA); DPP v VH (2004) 10 VR 234, 237…
Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 12
Citation 17

…unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, Marks, Hampel and McDonald JJ, 8 June 1993) 4–5 (Marks J, Hampel and McDonald JJ agreeing); R v Ware [1997] 1 VR 647, 653 (Hedigan AJA, Winneke P and Hayne JA agreeing); R v Wakime [1997] 1 VR 242, 244 (Winneke P, Hayne JA and Hedigan AJA agreeing); R v WEF [1998] 2 VR…
Peter Daniels (a pseudonym)[1] v The Queen [2017] VSCA 159
Citation 18

…[8] These are uncharged acts, which are only relevant as context evidence . See e.g. Daniel (a pseudonym) v R [2017] VSCA 159 [65] (Redlich and Priest JJA, Croucher AJA agreeing)…

AI Chat coming soon