Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
1
-
Nguyen v The Queen
[2017] VSCA 286
Citation 1
…arge of cultivate commercial quantity cannabis. Faro: [46]: No relevant priors. Reudin : [54] No priors. McClelland [2016] VCC 1467 Mullaly J [6]: … the matters to which I have previously referred to, prove beyond reasonable doubt, your role as a principal in this commercial cannabis crop . Your offending is mid-r…
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Nguyen v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 198
Citation 1
…25On the day after your conviction by the jury of 12, the Court of Appeal handed a 108-page decision in Nam Son Nguyen v R [2016] VSCA 198 . This decision is directly relevant to current sentencing practices for cultivating commercial quantities of cannabis. Whilst this decision was handed down after your convicti…
-
Nguyen v The Queen
[2013] VSCA 63
Citation 2
…uantity cases between 2013 and 2015. The majority of the cases referred to in that table were sentences imposed after a plea of guilty. In Nguyen v R [2013] VSCA 63 , a total effective sentence of six years and nine months with a non-parole period of four years and nine months was imposed. This was after a jury v…
-
Doan v The Queen
[2010] VSCA 250
Citation 3
…20Justice of Appeal, Buchanan noted in DPP v Duong [2010] VSCA 250 : “The maximum penalty of 25 years shows unambiguously how seriously the community, through Parliament, views this conduct.”…
-
Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso
[2010] VSCA 12
Citation 4
…that was subsequently referred to in shorthand by The Court of Appeal as Nguyen No. 2. 19The President of the Court of Appeal, Maxwell in Nguyen v R [2010] VSCA 12 – this is Nguyen No.1 – said this about the seriousness of the offence: “As has been readily pointed out in sentencing decisions, this is an offence…