Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ly

Director of Public Prosecutions v Ly

Case [2021] VCC 473

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Ly [2021] VCC 473
Case: [2021] VCC 473
Decision Date: 23 April 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Ly [2021] VCC 473

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 212
Citation 1

…slation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 2009 ss 145 & 242 – Sentencing Act 1991 ss 3(1) & 5(4) Cases Cited: Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 212 – R v Doran [2005] VSCA 271 – Brown (aka Davis) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60 – DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Ngu…
Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140
Citation 2

…68 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184 – Hudgson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 254 – Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment with a 18 months’ non-parole period…
Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60
Citation 3

…3(1) & 5(4) Cases Cited: Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 212 – R v Doran [2005] VSCA 271 – Brown (aka Davis) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60 – DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184 – Hudgson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 254 – Farmer…
Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184
Citation 4

…DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184 – Hudgson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 254 – Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment with a 18 months’ non-parole period…
Williamson v The Queen [2019] VSCA 138
Citation 5

…[44] [2019] VSCA 127 [26]–[30] (Priest and Kaye JJA). See also Williamson v The Queen (2019) VSCA 138 [116] (…
Kennedy v The Queen [2019] VSCA 127
Citation 6

…[44] [2019] VSCA 127 [26]–[30] (Priest and Kaye JJA). See also Williamson v The Queen (2019) VSCA 138 [116] (…
Arico v The Queen [2018] VSCA 135
Citation 7

…[17] See eg Gregory ibid ; Fernando v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 26, 41 [61]; Arico v The Queen [2018] VSCA 135 [338]–[339].…
Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62
Citation 8

…[31] Your counsel referred me to Perkins v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 62 and Neal v The Queen(1982) 149 CLR 305.…
Fernando v The Queen [2017] VSCA 208
Citation 9

…[17] See eg Gregory ibid ; Fernando v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 26, 41 [61]; Arico v The Queen [2018] VSCA 135 [338]–[339].…
Gregory v The Queen [2017] VSCA 15
Citation 10

…[2005] VSCA 271 – Brown (aka Davis) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60 – DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184 – Hudgson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 254 – Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 3 years’ imprisonm…
DPP v Hudgson [2016] VSCA 254
Citation 11

…CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 184 – Hudgson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 254 – Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment with a 18 months’ non-parole period…
Nguyen v The Queen [2016] VSCA 198
Citation 12

…[64] Nguyen v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 464, 468–9 [21] (Maxwell P, Buchanan JA agreeing). See also Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 311 FLR 289, 331 [141] (Redlich JA, Tate and Whelan JJA relevantly agreeing).…
Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17
Citation 13

…[64] Nguyen v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 464, 468–9 [21] (Maxwell P, Buchanan JA agreeing). See also Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 311 FLR 289, 331 [141] (Redlich JA, Tate and Whelan JJA relevantly agreeing).…
Stewart v The Queen [2015] VSCA 368
Citation 14

…457, 468–9 [46] (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA); Marrah v The Queen [2014] VSCA 119 [16]–[17] (Redlich and Tate JJA); Stewart v The Queen [2015] VSCA 368 [23]–[27] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); DPP v Tewksbury (2018) 271 A Crim R 205, 225 [97], 226 [104] (Tate and Kyrou JJA and Kidd AJA).…
Latina v The Queen [2015] VSCA 102
Citation 15

…[43] See R v Doran [2005] VSCA 271 [14]–[15] (Buchanan JA) and Latina v The Queen [2015] VSCA 102 [12] (Redlich and Kyrou JJA).…
Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2014] VSCA 145
Citation 16

…[1] See R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68, [12–[13] (Charles JA, Phillips JA and Bongiorno AJA agreeing); Reid (a pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 42 VR 295, 308 [74] (Priest JA, Maxwell P and Whelan JA agreeing).…
Marrah v The Queen [2014] VSCA 119
Citation 17

…[29] See eg DPP v Terrick (2009) 24 VR 457, 468–9 [46] (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA); Marrah v The Queen [2014] VSCA 119 [16]–[17] (Redlich and Tate JJA); Stewart v The Queen [2015] VSCA 368 [23]–[27] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); DPP v Tewksbury (2018) 271 A Crim R 205, 225 [97], 226 [104] (Tate and K…
Berichon v The Queen [2013] VSCA 319
Citation 18

…[19] Berichon v The Queen (2013) 40 VR 490, 496 [26] (Redlich JA). See also R v Graham (2007) 178 A Crim R 467; Armistead v The Queen [2011] VSCA 84.…
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Citation 19

…[30] (2013) 249 CLR 571, 592–4 [37]–[40] (French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ).…
Barbaro v The Queen [2012] VSCA 288
Citation 20

…[52] See Barbaro v The Queen (2012) 226 A Crim R 354, 364–365 [32]–[38] ((Maxwell P, Harper JA and T Forrest AJA).…
Armistead v The Queen [2011] VSCA 84
Citation 21

…[19] Berichon v The Queen (2013) 40 VR 490, 496 [26] (Redlich JA). See also R v Graham (2007) 178 A Crim R 467; Armistead v The Queen [2011] VSCA 84.…
Nguyen v The Queen [2010] NZCA 623
Citation 22

…[64] Nguyen v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 464, 468–9 [21] (Maxwell P, Buchanan JA agreeing). See also Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 311 FLR 289, 331 [141] (Redlich JA, Tate and Whelan JJA relevantly agreeing).…
DPP v Terrick [2009] VSCA 220
Citation 23

…[29] See eg DPP v Terrick (2009) 24 VR 457, 468–9 [46] (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA); Marrah v The Queen [2014] VSCA 119 [16]–[17] (Redlich and Tate JJA); Stewart v The Queen [2015] VSCA 368 [23]–[27] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); DPP v Tewksbury (2018) 271 A Crim R 205, 225 [97], 226 [104] (Tate and Ky…
Adams v The Queen [2008] HCA 15
Citation 24

…–[55] (Redlich JA); DPP v KMD (2015) 254 A Crim R 244, 254 [36], 257 [50]–[52], 260 [64] (Maxwell P, Weinberg and Beach JJA); Adams v The Queen (2008) 234 CLR 143.…
R v Graham [2007] VSCA 252
Citation 25

…[19] Berichon v The Queen (2013) 40 VR 490, 496 [26] (Redlich JA). See also R v Graham (2007) 178 A Crim R 467; Armistead v The Queen [2011] VSCA 84.…
R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
Citation 26

…[25] See R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269.…
R v Doran [2005] VSCA 271
Citation 27

…ure Act 2009 ss 145 & 242 – Sentencing Act 1991 ss 3(1) & 5(4) Cases Cited: Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 212 – R v Doran [2005] VSCA 271 – Brown (aka Davis) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60 – DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 482 – Gregory v The Queen (2017) 268 A Crim R 1 – Nguyen v The Queen [2019] VSCA 18…
R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68
Citation 28

…[1] See R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68, [12–[13] (Charles JA, Phillips JA and Bongiorno AJA agreeing); Reid (a pseudonym) v The Queen (2014) 42 VR 295, 308 [74] (Priest JA, Maxwell P and Whelan JA agreeing).…
Neal v The Queen [1982] HCA 55
Citation 29

…[31] Your counsel referred me to Perkins v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 62 and Neal v The Queen(1982) 149 CLR 305.…

AI Chat coming soon