Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Liberatore

Director of Public Prosecutions v Liberatore

Case [2024] VCC 231

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Liberatore [2024] VCC 231
Case: [2024] VCC 231
Decision Date: 7 March 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Liberatore [2024] VCC 231

Most Recent Citation

Liberatore v The King [2024] VSCA 263

Cases Citing This Decision

Liberatore v The King [2024] VSCA 263
Citation 1 (Para 3)

…When the applicant’s offending began in 2014, Jessica was planning her wedding to Peter.[1] [1] DPP v Liberatore [2024] VCC 231, [3]–[37] (‘Reasons’).…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Curtis v The Queen [2022] VSCA 5
Citation 1

…the effect of your imprisonment on your father and/or mother is not so exceptional as to attract a sentencing discount. [31] Curtis v The Queen [2022] VSCA 5 [22] (Priest JA and Niall JA). 118Moreover, in order to establish exceptional circumstances, there must be cogent evidence that establishes the situation i…
Wilson v The Queen [2022] VSCA 2
Citation 2

…ke P and Eames JA agreeing); Wilson v The Queen [2022] VSCA 2 [20] (Priest and Niall JJA). 99As the majority of the High Court in Veen v The Queen (No 2) [20] observed: The antecedent criminal history is relevant, however, to show whether the instant offence is an uncharacteristic aberration or whether the offen…
Russo v The Queen [2021] VSCA 244
Citation 3

…and McLeish JJA). See also Williams (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 35 [21]–[25] (Priest and Kyrou JJA); Russo v The Queen [2021] VSCA 244 [53]–[56] (Emerton JA, Priest JA agreeing). 122While current sentencing practice is relevant to the sentences I impose on you, it is only one of a number of sentencing c…
Sinclair v The Queen [2021] VSCA 144
Citation 4

…tevens v The Queen [2020] VSCA 170 [54]–[56] (Emerton and Weinberg JJA); Sinclair v The Queen [2021] VSCA 144 [20]–[25] (Maxwell P and Kaye JA). 134I must also announce the effect of the proposed aggregate sentence,[45] which is that you will receive one sentence of imprisonment for all 31 offences, however, that…
Williams (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 35
Citation 5

…JJA). [37] (2016) 53 VR 546, 606–609 [173]–[183] (Redlich, Santamaria and McLeish JJA). See also Williams (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 35 [21]–[25] (Priest and Kyrou JJA); Russo v The Queen [2021] VSCA 244 [53]–[56] (Emerton JA, Priest JA agreeing). 122While current sentencing practice is relevant to the…
Brown v The Queen [2020] NZHC 1494
Citation 6

…on to the application of Verdin’s principles.[14] [13] Verdins 276 [32(6)] (emphasis added). [14] Brown v The Queen (2020) 62 VR 491, 507–08 [60]–[62]. (Maxwell P, Niall JA, T Forrest JA, Emerton JA, Osborn JA). 90Moreover, since you have not received treatment from Ms Abbott since you were remanded in custody, and Ms Abbo…
Stevens v The Queen [2020] VSCA 170
Citation 7

…acar v The Queen [2019] VSCA 178 [29]–[33] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); Stevens v The Queen [2020] VSCA 170 [54]–[56] (Emerton and Weinberg JJA); Sinclair v The Queen [2021] VSCA 144 [20]–[25] (Maxwell P and Kaye JA). 134I must also announce the effect of the proposed aggregate sentence,[45] which is that you…
Cokacar v The Queen [2019] VSCA 178
Citation 8

…rling J). [44] DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660, 670 [44] (Maxwell P); Cokacar v The Queen [2019] VSCA 178 [29]–[33] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); Stevens v The Queen [2020] VSCA 170 [54]–[56] (Emerton and Weinberg JJA); Sinclair v The Queen [2021] VSCA 144 [20]–[25] (Maxwell P and Kaye JA). 134I must al…
Crawford (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2018] VSCA 113
Citation 9

…m) v The Queen [2017] VSCA 340 [17]–[18], [29]–[30] (Maxwell P and Croucher AJA; Crawford v The Queen [2018] VSCA 113 [43]–[44] (Maxwell P and Kyrou JA); R v Richard [2011] NSWSC 866 [102]–[109] (Garling J). [44] DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660, 670 [44] (Maxwell P); Cokacar v The Queen [2019] VSCA 178 [29…
McCray (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2017] VSCA 340
Citation 10

…2004] VSCA 68 [13] (Charles JA, Phillips JA and Bongiorno AJA agreeing); McCray (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2017] VSCA 340 [17]–[18], [29]–[30] (Maxwell P and Croucher AJA; Crawford v The Queen [2018] VSCA 113 [43]–[44] (Maxwell P and Kyrou JA); R v Richard [2011] NSWSC 866 [102]–[109] (Garling J). [44] DPP v Frews…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 11

…referred to me by the prosecutor, and your counsel. [34] (2016) 259 CLR 256, 266–268 [21]–[25] (Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ). [35] (2017) 262 CLR 428,444–447 [47]–[58] (Kiefel CJ, Bell and Keane JJ), 452–455 [78]–[85] (Gageler and Gordon JJ). [36] (2015) 250 A Crim R 282, 292 [30]–[31] (Redlich, Priest…
Bellizia v The Queen [2016] VSCA 21
Citation 12

…07) 17 VR 571, 580 [37] (Maxwell P); Bellizia v R [2016] VSCA 21 [75], [77–78] (Santamaria JA); R v Pham [2003] VSCA 207 [12] (Vincent JA, Winneke P and Eames JA agreeing); Wilson v The Queen [2022] VSCA 2 [20] (Priest and Niall JJA). 99As the majority of the High Court in Veen v The Queen (No 2) [20] observed: T…
DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 266
Citation 13

…t 1991 Cases Cited: R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 – Markovic v The Queen (2010) 30 VR 589 – DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: 5 year’s and 3 month’s imprisonment – Non-parole period 3 years and 8 months…
Brown v R [2014] NZCA 93
Citation 14

…ion of Verdin’s principles.[14] [13] Verdins 276 [32(6)] (emphasis added). [14] Brown v The Queen (2020) 62 VR 491, 507–08 [60]–[62]. (Maxwell P, Niall JA, T Forrest JA, Emerton JA, Osborn JA). 90Moreover, since you have not received treatment from Ms Abbott since you were remanded in custody, and Ms Abbott opines…
Rodriguez v DPP (Cth) [2013] VSCA 216
Citation 15

…and uncertainty of having the prospect of a sentence hanging over one’s head during the period of delay is akin to punishment in itself.[23] [22] (2013) 40 VR 436. [23] Ibid 445–6 [36] (Warren CJ and Redlich JA) (citations omitted). 104There is some evidence before me regarding the efforts you have made towards you…
R v Richard [2011] NSWSC 866
Citation 16

…Croucher AJA; Crawford v The Queen [2018] VSCA 113 [43]–[44] (Maxwell P and Kyrou JA); R v Richard [2011] NSWSC 866 [102]–[109] (Garling J). [44] DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660, 670 [44] (Maxwell P); Cokacar v The Queen [2019] VSCA 178 [29]–[33] (Maxwell P, Priest JA agreeing); Stevens v The Queen [2020]…
Markovic v The Queen [2010] VSCA 105
Citation 17

…ncreasing burden of imprisonment Legislation Cited: Sentencing Act 1991 Cases Cited: R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 – Markovic v The Queen (2010) 30 VR 589 – DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: 5 year’s and 3 month’s imprisonment – Non-parole period 3 years and 8 months…
R v Esposito [2009] VSCA 277
Citation 18

…nt’s care. I note in this regard no evidence was given by your mother, your father, your brother, or, indeed, by you. [32] R v Esposito [2009] VSCA 277 [14] (Nettle JA, Buchanan JA agreeing). 119I do accept your parents suffer from the conditions referred to in the two letters, although the exact nature and extent…
R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
Citation 19

…d – Family hardship increasing burden of imprisonment Legislation Cited: Sentencing Act 1991 Cases Cited: R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 – Markovic v The Queen (2010) 30 VR 589 – DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: 5 year’s and 3 month’s imprisonment – Non-parole period 3 years and 8 months…
R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68
Citation 20

…ur] conduct”’[44] in relation to these charges. [41] SA s 9(3)(a). [42] See SA s 9(1). [43] See R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68 [13] (Charles JA, Phillips JA and Bongiorno AJA agreeing); McCray (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2017] VSCA 340 [17]–[18], [29]–[30] (Maxwell P and Croucher AJA; Crawford v The Queen [2018] VSCA 11…
R v Pham [2003] VSCA 207
Citation 21

…VSCA 21 [75], [77–78] (Santamaria JA); R v Pham [2003] VSCA 207 [12] (Vincent JA, Winneke P and Eames JA agreeing); Wilson v The Queen [2022] VSCA 2 [20] (Priest and Niall JJA). 99As the majority of the High Court in Veen v The Queen (No 2) [20] observed: The antecedent criminal history is relevant, however, to sh…
Tsiadis v Patterson [2001] VSCA 138
Citation 22

…ed acts of dishonesty.[7] Your offending was premeditated, relatively sophisticated, well planned and executed. [7] DPP v Bulfin [1998] 4 VR 114, 132 (Charles JA). 58Moreover, when the victims sought reassurance from you regarding the use of the funds, rather than desist from your offending, you sought to c…
Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14
Citation 23

…[20] (1988) 164 CLR 465. [21] Ibid 477 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Dawson and Toohey JJ). 100Your prior criminal history demonstrates you have manifested in your commission of the present offences ‘a continuing attitude of disobedience of the law’, which has continued after the period of the present offences. Accordingly, it…
The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCATrans 240
Citation 24

…g [36] and DPP (Cth) v Thomas .[37] In particular, I have had regard to the comparable cases referred to me by the prosecutor, and your counsel. [34] (2016) 259 CLR 256, 266–268 [21]–[25] (Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ). [35] (2017) 262 CLR 428,444–447 [47]–[58] (Kiefel CJ, Bell and Keane JJ), 452–455 [7…
DPP (Cth) v Thomas [2005] VSC 85
Citation 25

…Keane JJ), 452–455 [78]–[85] (Gageler and Gordon JJ). [36] (2015) 250 A Crim R 282, 292 [30]–[31] (Redlich, Priest and Beach JJA). [37] (2016) 53 VR 546, 606–609 [173]–[183] (Redlich, Santamaria and McLeish JJA). See also Williams (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2021] VSCA 35 [21]–[25] (Priest and Kyrou JJA); Russo v Th…

AI Chat coming soon