-
DPP v Kenneison
[2023] VSCA 321
Citation 1
…ven when the constituent circumstances are mainly, or even wholly, relevantly common[12] . [12] See also DPP v Kenneison [2023] VSCA 321 [37]-[41]; Fariah v The Queen [2021] VSCA 213. 89Within the bounds of reasonableness whether an applicant’s circumstances meet the threshold requirement of s.5(2H)(e) is ultimat…
-
DPP v Richardson
[2023] VSCA 241
Citation 2
…[16] See also DPP v Richardson [2023] VSCA 241.…
-
Wright v The King
[2023] VSCA 243
Citation 3
…es, your very good prospects of rehabilitation demonstrated by your progress in the community while on bail. [14] Wright v The King [2023] VSCA 243. 114For completeness after the plea hearing, I had you assessed for a community corrections order and you were assessed as suitable. 115In all the circumstances, I do…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Lombardo
[2022] VSCA 204
Citation 4
…Cited: Gregory (a pseudonym) v R (2017) 268 A Crim R 1; R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010] VSC 139. Sentence:Total effective se…
-
Buckley v The Queen
[2022] VSCA 138
Citation 5
…on submit that the nature and the gravity of the offending calls for an immediate term of imprisonment to be imposed. [9] Buckley v The Queen [2022] VSCA 138. 83In determining whether there are substantial and compelling circumstances under subsection (2H)(e) the relevant legislative provisions provide as follows;…
-
Fariah v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 213
Citation 6
…nly, or even wholly, relevantly common[12] . [12] See also DPP v Kenneison [2023] VSCA 321 [37]-[41]; Fariah v The Queen [2021] VSCA 213. 89Within the bounds of reasonableness whether an applicant’s circumstances meet the threshold requirement of s.5(2H)(e) is ultimately for the sentencing judge to determine and…
-
Gayed v the Queen
[2021] VSCA 141
Citation 7
…native nor controlling factor in the sentencing calculus ( Condo [2019] VSCA 181; Gayed v The Queen [2021] VSCA 141); DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741. 30Briefly in DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301 police located the offender asleep in his car and conducted a search of it seizing a range of…
-
Lytras v The Queen
[2020] VSCA 150
Citation 8
…, is far removed from the circumstances and very large and sophisticated offending in Gregory . [2] [2020] VSCA 150. 28I have taken into account the cases referred to by Counsel. While offering assistance of course, each case turns on its own facts and circumstances. 29The prosecution submit that the cases of Rina…
-
Farmer v The Queen
[2020] VSCA 140
Citation 9
…6AAA Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Cases Cited: Gregory (a pseudonym) v R (2017) 268 A Crim R 1; R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010…
-
DPP v Condo
[2019] VSCA 181
Citation 10
…account but it is neither a determinative nor controlling factor in the sentencing calculus ( Condo [2019] VSCA 181; Gayed v The Queen [2021] VSCA 141); DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741. 30Briefly in DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301 police located the offender asleep in his car and conducted…
-
Mitchell v The Queen
[2016] VSCA 321
Citation 11
…pal of totality, given all the offending relates to the one day. [5] See Mitchell v R [2016] VSCA 321. 37I accept that your drug use at the time may have contributed to the offending, that you likely have a substance abuse disorder[6] and that you were also partly funding your own use. However, given the quantitie…
-
DPP v Zhuang
[2015] VSCA 96
Citation 12
…ble sentences may play a part in informing the instinctive synthesis, as stated in DPP v Zhuang [2015] VSCA 96 ‘Sentences passed in other cases are not precedents which must be followed unless they are capable of being distinguished. Every sentence must be the product of the intuitive synthesis of all factors rel…
-
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
Citation 13
…go through’ and that it has been, as supported by the report of Mr Cummins, impactful. [7] Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37. 65The prosecution do not accept that your youth was ‘traumatic’ and submit that the highest the evidence rises is that your mental health was ‘disturbed’. With reference to an earlier DATC…
-
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102
Citation 14
…offence Legislation Cited: ss 5(1), 6AAA Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Cases Cited: Gregory (a pseudonym) v R (2017) 268 A Crim R 1; R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [202…
-
R v Osenkowski
[2005] SASC 142
Citation 15
…(2017) 268 A Crim R 1; R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010] VSC 139. Sentence:Total effective sentence of 2 years and 8 months impr…
-
Thoroughvision Pty Ltd v Sky Channel Pty Ltd
[2010] VSC 139
Citation 16
…v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010] VSC 139. Sentence:Total effective sentence of 2 years and 8 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 1 year and 1 month.…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Duffy
[2021] VCC 1741
Citation 17
…he Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010] VSC 139. Sentence:Total effective sentence of 2 years and 8 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 1 year and 1 month.…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Rinaldi
[2016] VCC 1301
Citation 18
…s [2007] VSCA 102; Farmer v The Queen [2020] VSCA 140; Lombardo v The Queen [2022] VSCA 204; R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; DPP v Rinaldi [2016] VCC 1301; DPP v Duffy [2021] VCC 1741; Power v the Queen [2010] VSC 139. Sentence:Total effective sentence of 2 years and 8 months imprisonment, with a non-parole per…