Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v E. and O. Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar

Director of Public Prosecutions v E. and O. Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar

Case [2021] VCC 1024

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v E. and O. Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024
Case: [2021] VCC 1024
Decision Date: 29 July 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v E. and O. Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v A1 Engineering (Vic) Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 853

Cases Citing This Decision

Dennis Jones Engineering Pty Ltd v The King; Jones v The King [2025] VSCA 76
Citation 1 (Para 9)

…also referred to the circumstances of: DPP v Fergusson and Jacbe Builders Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1276; DPP v E & O Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024; and VWA v Valley Sweep Pty Ltd and Anton Zakic (Unreported, Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Court, 2 October 2020).…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Basa [2025] VCC 1181
Citation 2 (Para 5)

…v Oriana [2024] VCC 535; DPP v Palladian Three Pty Ltd and Sack Sackl [2022] VCC 325; DPP v E & O Lagondar Nominees Pty Ltd and Emil Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024; and DPP v Jacbe Builders Pty Ltd and David Fergusson [2017] VCC 1276. [8] I found three decisions, involving individual duty-holders, to be particularly hel…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones [2023] VCC 2054
Citation 3

…spection Services Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 1047; DPP v Fergusson and Jacbe Builders Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1276; DPP v E. & O. Lagondar Nominees and Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024; VWA v Valley Sweep Pty Ltd and Anton Zakic (Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Court, 2 October 2020); DPP v Amcor Packaging Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 11 VR 5…
Director of Public Prosecutions v A1 Engineering (Vic) Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 853
Citation 4

…ew Buchanan Engineering Ltd [2021] VCC 2162, DPP v Multiworks Australia Pty Ltd [2021] VCC 1553, DPP v E. & O. Lagondar Nominees Pty Ltd and Lagondar [2021] VCC 1024, DPP v Pipecon Pty Ltd [2021] VCC 1808, DPP v Elliott Engineering Pty Ltd, Unreported, County Court of Victoria, Judge Murphy, 27 February 2014…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Di Tonto v The Queen; AM Design and Construction Pty Ltd v The Queen [2018] VSCA 312
Citation 1

…(1) Cases Cited: DPP v Amcor Packaging Pty Ltd (2005) 11 VR 557 – Holmes v R E Spence & Co Pty Ltd (1992) 5 VIR 119 – Di Tonto & Anor v The Queen [2018] VSCA 312 – Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 – DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676 – DPP v Frewstal (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: E &…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 2

…was charged with an offence under s 23(1) of the Act. [30] (2016) 259 CLR 256, 266–8 [21]–[25] (Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ). [31] (2017) 262 CLR 428 (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane and Gordon JJ). [32] ‘Comparable Cases’, undated (Ex P6). [33] ‘Comparable Cases of the Accuseds’, dated 8 June 2021 (Ex…
R v Irvine [2016] SASCFC 104
Citation 3

…mes v R E Spence & Co Pty Ltd , ‘human frailty is an ever-present reality’.[25] [23] R v Irvine (2009) 25 VR 75, 84 [48] (Neave JA, Nettle JA and Lasry AJA agreeing). [24] R v Commercial Industrial Construction Group Pty Ltd (2006) 14 VR 321, 329 [35] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Redlich JJA). [25] (1992) 5 VIR 119, 1…
DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 55
Citation 4

…VIR 119 – Di Tonto & Anor v The Queen [2018] VSCA 312 – Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 – DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676 – DPP v Frewstal (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: E & O Lagonda Nominees Pty Ltd convicted and fined $250,000 – Emil Lagondar convicted and fined $125,000…
DPP v Frewstal Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 266
Citation 5

…n [2018] VSCA 312 – Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 – DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676 – DPP v Frewstal (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: E & O Lagonda Nominees Pty Ltd convicted and fined $250,000 – Emil Lagondar convicted and fined $125,000…
Orbit Drilling v The Queen [2012] VSCA 82
Citation 6

…1 VR 557 – Holmes v R E Spence & Co Pty Ltd (1992) 5 VIR 119 – Di Tonto & Anor v The Queen [2018] VSCA 312 – Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 – DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676 – DPP v Frewstal (2015) 47 VR 660 Sentence: E & O Lagonda Nominees Pty Ltd convicted and fined $250,000…
Vines v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2007] NSWCA 126
Citation 7

…al law of torts’.[21] [20] Corporations Law (Cth) s 232(4). [21] Vines v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2007) 73 NSWLR 451, 460 [68], 463–4 [84]–[85] (Spigelman CJ, Ipp JA agreeing). 47Accordingly, an objective standard of reasonable care is to be applied in assessing your level of culpability under…
R v Commercial Industrial Construction Group Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 181
Citation 8

…A, Nettle JA and Lasry AJA agreeing). [24] R v Commercial Industrial Construction Group Pty Ltd (2006) 14 VR 321, 329 [35] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Redlich JJA). [25] (1992) 5 VIR 119, 123; referred to with approval in R v Australian Char Pty Ltd [1999] 3 VR 834, 847 [55] (Phillips CJ, Smith and Ashley JJ ) and DPP…
DPP v Amcor Packaging Australia Pty Ltd [2005] VSCA 219
Citation 9

…Legislation Cited: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 ss 26(1), 144(1) Cases Cited: DPP v Amcor Packaging Pty Ltd (2005) 11 VR 557 – Holmes v R E Spence & Co Pty Ltd (1992) 5 VIR 119 – Di Tonto & Anor v The Queen [2018] VSCA 312 – Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 – DPP v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pt…
The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCATrans 240
Citation 10

…rector charged with an offence under s 144(1) of the OHSA , while his small family company was charged with an offence under s 23(1) of the Act. [30] (2016) 259 CLR 256, 266–8 [21]–[25] (Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ). [31] (2017) 262 CLR 428 (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane and Gordon JJ). [32] ‘Compara…
Vines v Australian Securities and Investment Commission [2007] HCATrans 797
Citation 11

…that: ‘It is therefore of assistance to look to the general law of torts’.[21] [20] Corporations Law (Cth) s 232(4). [21] Vines v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2007) 73 NSWLR 451, 460 [68], 463–4 [84]–[85] (Spigelman CJ, Ipp JA agreeing). 47Accordingly, an objective standard of reasonable care is to be applied in assessing your level of culp…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hazelwood Pacific Pty Ltd & Ors (Sentence) [2020] VSC 279
Citation 12

…ld properly reflect the overall criminality of you both.[37] [37] See e.g., DPP v Hazelwood Pacific Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] VSC 279 [138]–[144] (Keogh J). 72The basic purposes for which a court may impose a sentence are just punishment, deterrence, both specific and general, rehabilitation, denunciation and protecti…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Fergusson; Director of Public Prosecutions and Jacbe Pty Ltd (First Revision) [2017] VCC 1276
Citation 13

…d v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399, 416 [68]-[69] (Maxwell P, Bongiorno JA and Kyrou AJA) (‘ Orbit Drilling ’); DPP (Vic) v Fergusson [2017] VCC 1276, [15] (‘Fergusson’). 69As the Court of Appeal explained in Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd v The Queen ,[36] there is ‘a fundamental distinction’, between your personal liability…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Australian Box Recycling Proprietary Limited [2016] VCC 1056
Citation 14

…no, or little, expenditure, increases moral culpability.[22] [22] DPP v Australian Box Recycling Pty Ltd [2016] VCC 1056 [22]–[24] (Judge Wischusen). 51The only other person who contributed to the Company’s contravention of the OHSA was the deceased himself. However, the seriousness of these offences is not lesse…

AI Chat coming soon