Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Atem

Director of Public Prosecutions v Atem

Case [2019] VCC 1177

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Atem [2019] VCC 1177
Case: [2019] VCC 1177
Decision Date: 6 August 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Atem [2019] VCC 1177

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Omar [2019] VCC 1177

Cases Citing This Decision

Atem v The Queen [2020] VSCA 35
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…, Dieu Mawut Atem (‘Atem’) applies for leave to appeal against sentence.[1] The sole proposed ground of appeal is manifest excess. [1] DPP v Atem [2019] VCC 1177 (‘Reasons’).…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Omar [2013] VCC 1177
Citation 2

…[2019] VCC 1177…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41
Citation 1

…Act 1991 Cases Cited: Verdins, Buckley & Vo (2007) 16 VR 269; Mills (1998) 4 VR 235; Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196; DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41; DPP v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years…
Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196
Citation 2

…Legislation Cited: Sentencing Act 1991 Cases Cited: Verdins, Buckley & Vo (2007) 16 VR 269; Mills (1998) 4 VR 235; Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196; DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41; DPP v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 year…
DPP v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116
Citation 3

…Buckley & Vo (2007) 16 VR 269; Mills (1998) 4 VR 235; Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196; DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41; DPP v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years…
R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
Citation 4

…Legislation Cited: Sentencing Act 1991 Cases Cited: Verdins, Buckley & Vo (2007) 16 VR 269; Mills (1998) 4 VR 235; Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196; DPP v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41; DPP v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116 Sentence: Total effective sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years…
R v Tran [2002] VSCA 52
Citation 5

…rrence must bulk large in informing a sound discretionary determination. ” Mr Rochford QC also took the court to The Queen v Elizabeth Anh Tran [2002] VSCA 52, in which the court observed that although in the case of a youthful offender, rehabilitation is usually far more important than general deterrence, there…

AI Chat coming soon