DEAN HENRY STONE & ANOR
v
SIMON WALLMAN CHAPPEL & ANOR
[2017] HCASL 269
A27/2017
In our opinion there are insufficient prospects that the orders of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia would be reversed on appeal to warrant the grant of special leave.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
V.M. Bell
12 October 2017G.A.A. Nettle
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Dean Henry Stone & Anor v Simon Wallman Chappel and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] HCASL 269
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the merits of the applicants' claims and assessed whether there were sufficient grounds for allowing the appeal. In reaching its decision, the court emphasised the importance of considering the overall prospects of success of the appeal, rather than focusing solely on isolated points of law or procedure. The court noted that the applicants had not demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success on appeal and that the Full Court's decision appeared to be well-reasoned and supported by the evidence. The court also took into account the fact that the applicants had not identified any significant errors of law or fact that would warrant a reversal of the Full Court's decision.
Ultimately, the court determined that there were insufficient prospects that the Full Court's orders would be reversed on appeal. The court found that the applicants had not established a reasonable likelihood of success on appeal and that the appeal was not likely to result in a different outcome. Accordingly, the court dismissed the applicants' application for special leave to appeal and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This decision highlights the importance of demonstrating a substantial likelihood of success on appeal and the court's focus on the overall merits of the appeal, rather than individual points of law or procedure.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.