[2013] AATA 216
Division Veterans' Appeals Division File Number(s)
2010/3682
Re
Dawn McKenzie
APPLICANT
And
Repatriation Commission
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Tribunal Deputy President J W Constance
Date 11 April 2013 Place Melbourne The decision under review, being the decision of the Repatriation Commission made 20 November 2009 rejecting Mrs McKenzie's claim for a pension in accordance with the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), is affirmed.
.....................[sgd]...............................................
Deputy President J W Constance
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS' AND MILITARY COMPENSATION – widow’s pension – whether death was war-caused –– cardiomyopathy – malignant neoplasm of the oesophagus – whether material raises an hypothesis connecting the death with the circumstances of operational service – smoking and supply of cigarettes to members of the Australian Defence Forces –– decision under review affirmed.
LEGISLATION
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 9, 120, 120A
CASES
Dixon v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 582
East v Repatriation Commission (1987) 16 FCR 517
Forrester and Repatriation Commission [2012] AATA 846
McKenna v Repatriation Commission (1996) 86 FCR 144Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82
REASONS FOR DECISION
Deputy President J W Constance
INTRODUCTION
Mrs McKenzie is the widow of the late Mr McKenzie who served in the Royal Australian Air Force during the Second World War. He served in the Philippines.
Mrs McKenzie has applied for a pension under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth). Her application has been refused by the Commission and Mrs McKenzie has applied to this Tribunal for a review of that decision.
For the reasons which follow the decision under review will be affirmed.
MATERIAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL
Mr McKenzie’s service records
Mr McKenzie was a member of the Royal Australian Air Force from 10 July 1942 until 25 January 1946. He served in the Philippines from 1 August 1945 until 27 October 1945.[1]
[1] Exhibit RR2 p.1.
Mrs McKenzie’s evidence
Mr and Mrs McKenzie were married in 1953. Mrs McKenzie first met Mr McKenzie about one year before their marriage.
Mr McKenzie did not smoke tobacco at any time after he and Mrs McKenzie met.
Mr McKenzie told Mrs McKenzie the following:
owhen he was serving in the Philippines his duties involved the interception and de-coding of Japanese Army signals;
ohis duties in the Philippines were stressful; he undertook long shifts which were tedious and he felt keenly the sense of responsibility which these duties imposed upon him;
ohe began smoking during his service years as he worked in a small group and he felt pressure to smoke;
otobacco was readily available during his service and he received rations of tobacco;
othere were long periods during service when he was inactive and felt bored and he would pass the time by smoking;
oin the Philippines he served not far from where there was enemy contact;
ohis habit extended for approximately 10 years, from about the time of his enlistment until shortly before [they] met.[2]
[2] Exhibit AA1.
Mr McKenzie did not tell Mrs McKenzie how much he smoked.
Mr McKenzie’s treating general practitioner for 30-40…
Continue reading Dawn McKenzie and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Dawn McKenzie and Repatriation Commission [2013] AATA 216
- Case
- [2013] AATA 216
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the court involved interpreting the statutory provisions concerning war-caused injuries or diseases and the standard of proof required for such claims. Specifically, the court examined whether there was a reasonable hypothesis connecting Mr McKenzie's oesophageal cancer with his service, supported by a Statement of Principles, and whether the Commission's decision to reject the claim was supported by the evidence. The court also considered the relevance of Mr McKenzie's smoking habits, which were inconsistently documented, and how this impacted the assessment of the claim.
The court found that there was insufficient evidence to establish a reasonable hypothesis that Mr McKenzie's oesophageal cancer was connected to his war service, given the inconsistencies in the documentation of his smoking habits and the lack of a Statement of Principles upholding such a hypothesis. The court affirmed that the Commission's decision to reject the claim was correct as it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the cancer was war-caused. The court concluded that the Commission's decision was legally sound and did not err in law or procedure.
The final orders of the court affirmed the decision of the Repatriation Commission made on 20 November 2009, rejecting Mrs McKenzie's claim for a pension in accordance with the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Ms McKenzie recalls that when she was about 10 years old she had a conversation with her father during which she asked him if he had ever smoked and he replied that he was a keen smoker and that he smoked anything he could get [his] hands on.[5] She also recalls her father telling her that he found smoking inconvenient whilst at work and that he smoked a lot.[6][5] Transcript 11.2.13.[6] Transcript 11.2.13.Extracts from letters from Mr McKenzie to his family while on operational service[7][7] Exhibit AA10. While overseas Mr McKenzie wrote:Cigarettes are for sale on board for 3/- per carton of 200, which of course is less duty, which boosts up prices many times ashore. On 28 June 1945 Mr McKenzie wrote:We are get [sic] 600 cigarettes for a pound very shortly. Not bad eh! On 24 July 1945 he wrote:All along the railway line the local kids + grown ups crowded around the train trying to exchange Jap invasion money for cigarettes which by the way are worth a peso a packet (3/1) of twenty to sell to the natives. On 5 August 1945 he wrote:As this is still supposed to be an operational area , we receive a free issue of American cigarettes – a packet of twenty a day …… We got our “comforts issue” as they call it tonight. It consisted of five packets of yank Raleigh cigarettes & five boxes of matches. We have an issue every five days & so are allowed twenty cigarettes per day. On 9 August 1945 he wrote:I also bought a pipe at the Yank canteen for three shillings. … On 17 August 1945 he wrote:… I still have my pipe & even went so far as to buy some cleaners for it tonight, because two chaps moved out of the tent as a protest against the high scent of the rattling thing. (It wasn’t quite as bad as that but I still have it anyway). On 17 September 1945 he wrote:I had to go to Manilla the other day to pick up our ration of smokes …References to Mr McKenzie’s smoking habit in South West Health Care clinical notes[8][8] Exhibit AA7. Date Reference to smoking Page number29/10/80 Non-smoker 44405/03/96 No 40203/11/99 Non-smoker for 50 years 17621/05/04 Former 60 years ago 34601/12/04? No 13602/01/05 No 29202/01/05 Former 297, 29516/02/09 Ever? Yes. Stopped? 60 years ago 27426/04/09 Never 24027/04/09 Ever? Yes. Stopped? 1950 24706/07/09 Former 60 years ago 211, 209References to Mr McKenzie’s smoking habit in Epworth Health care clinical notes[9][9] Exhibit AA5. Date Reference to smoking Page number09/02/99 No 12919/10/99 No 5724/05/00 No 3131/03/03 Past 50 years ago 13References to Mr McKenzie’s smoking habit in Dr Menzies’ clinical notes[10][10] Exhibit AA8. On 18 June 2003 Dr Menzies recorded that Mr McKenzie smoked 60 years ago.Report of Dr Lynch, Radiation Oncologist On 1 June 2009 Dr Lynch reported that histopathology carried out in May 2009 revealed Mr McKenzie had moderate to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in an area of Barrett’s oesophagus … .[11][11] Exhibit AA6 p.4.Report of Dr Ung, Radiology Oncology Registrar In a report dated 25 June 2009[12] Dr Ung noted that Mr McKenzie had completed a course of palliative radiotherapy which commenced on 1 June 2009 and was completed on 22 June 2009.[12] Exhibit AA6 p.5.Report of Dr Collins, Consultant Forensic Pathologist