Darley v Darley

Case [2021] HCASL 173


DARLEY

v

DARLEY & ANOR

[2021] HCASL 173
B40/2021

  1. An extension of time is necessary to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The application does not show any reason to doubt that the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia was correct. The application should be refused. In these circumstances, it would be futile to grant the extension of time necessary to enable the application to proceed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
9 September 2021
Details
AGLC
Darley v Darley [2021] HCASL 173
Case
[2021] HCASL 173
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the High Court of Australia, the case of Darley v Darley & Anor dealt with a family law dispute. The matter involved an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia, where the applicant sought an extension of time to proceed with the appeal. The applicant's contention was that there was a reasonable prospect that the Full Court's decision was incorrect and that the extension of time was necessary to effectively pursue the appeal.

The legal issues the court was required to decide centred around whether the application for special leave to appeal should be granted and, if so, whether an extension of time was necessary and appropriate. The court needed to assess the merits of the applicant's argument regarding the correctness of the Full Court's decision and whether the application met the criteria for granting an extension of time under the High Court Rules. The court also needed to consider the futility of proceeding with the application given the lack of demonstrated error in the Full Court's decision.

The High Court determined that the application for special leave to appeal did not show any reason to doubt that the decision of the Full Court was correct. The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of special leave. Additionally, the court held that it would be futile to grant the extension of time as the application did not present a valid basis for appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to draw up an order to that effect. The reasoning was that the application did not meet the criteria for an extension of time and the appeal was unlikely to succeed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.