Legal Research
Cases
Dalton v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW)

Dalton v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW)

Case [1985] FCA 298

Jurisdiction

Interlocutory Orders

Stay of Proceedings

Administrative Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

)

p m SOUTH WALES REGISTRY	)	No. G154 of 1985
)
GENERAL DIVISION	)

BETMEE!N:

NADA WILLIAMS

Applicant

THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION

AND

ETHNIC AFFAIRS

Respondent

MINUTES OF ORDER

Judge making order: Beaumont, J.

Date order made:

3 July 1985.

Where made

Sydney

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Order

thst

the

appllcatlon

for

an Interim

stay of

the

deportation

order

In respect of Harry Willlams be

refused.

Make no order as

to costs.

Note:

Settlement and entry of orders

1 s dealt with in

Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT

OF AUSTRALIA )

)

P I E M SOUTH GJALES REGISTRY	)	No. G154 of 1985
)
GENERAL DIVISION	1

NADA

WILLI-WS

Applicant

THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND

ETHNIC AFFAIRS

Respondent

CORAM: Beaumont, J.

DATED:

3 July 1985.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

For the reasons glven in the related matter

Harry Wllllams

The Mlnlster for Immiqratlon and Ethnlc

Affairs

(No.

G155

of 1985)

Ipropose

refuse

thls

application for an Interim

stay.

In the clrcumstances, it

1 s unnecessary to make any other

o der.

I make the following orders:

Order

that the

appllcatlon

for

Interim

stay of

the

deportation order

respect

of Harry

Wllllams be

refused.

Make

no order as

to costs.

I certify that th:s cxl the 1

p m \ , . ,;,L

page$

2 :;: -c! cspy of tbe rec".sms

Judgment herein of The Honocrable

&l;	Justice Beam nt.

i f

Associate

Qated 3

- 7 -3s

Details

AGLC: Dalton v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) [1985] FCA 298
Case: [1985] FCA 298
Decision Date: 3 Jul 1985

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Nada Williams v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs involved the applicant, Nada Williams, seeking an interim stay of the deportation order issued against her husband, Harry Williams. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia by Justice Beaumont. The primary issue before the court was whether to grant an interim stay of the deportation order, effectively halting the deportation proceedings against Harry Williams until the substantive application for review was determined.

In considering the matter, the court was required to weigh the merits of the application for an interim stay against the potential prejudice to the respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs. The court examined the likelihood of success on the merits of the substantive application, the balance of convenience, and any other relevant factors that might influence the decision.

Justice Beaumont concluded that the application for an interim stay should be refused. The reasoning provided in the judgment was that the circumstances did not warrant a stay of the deportation order. The court found that there was no sufficient basis to believe that the deportation order would be overturned on the substantive application. Additionally, the balance of convenience favoured the respondent, as maintaining the deportation order would avoid potential prejudice and disruption to immigration processes. The court made no order as to costs.

The final orders of the court were to refuse the application for an interim stay of the deportation order in respect of Harry Williams and to make no order as to costs.

Orders