Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd v Regis Resources Limited

Link copied
Case Copied 42 min read
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

COMMERCIAL AND EQUITY DIVISION

No. 10323 of 2009

BETWEEN

DALKEITH RESOURCES PTY LTD
(ACN 061 721 453)
Plaintiff
v
REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED
(ACN 009 174 761)
Defendant

---

JUDGE:

MACAULAY J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

22 – 25 May 2012

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

29 June 2012

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd v Regis Resources Limited

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2012] VSC 288

---

CONTRACT — Whether contract for services validly terminated — Contract for services as managing director — Provisions in constitution and in Corporations Act for removal of director concurrent and alternative — Director removed from office under s 203D Corporations Act — Valid termination under contractual right where managing director ‘vacated office’ by ceasing to be a director under the Corporations Act.

CONTRACT — Contractual entitlement to “earn a contract bonus” — Whether terms of bonus orally agreed — No oral agreement — No authority to contract.

CONTRACT — Contractual obligation to grant share options — Whether implied term that the obligation to grant options was subject to shareholders’ approval — No breach of contract for failure to grant options — No damages resulting.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Plaintiff Mr Stewart Anderson SC with Mr David Morgan Holding Redlich
For the Defendant Mr Matthew Connock SC with Mr Richard Attiwill Freehills

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 1

Arguments and issues....................................................................................................................... 2

Summary of conclusions................................................................................................................... 4

Did Regis breach an obligation to give Dalkeith nine months’ notice of termination?....... 5

The termination provisions in the services contract................................................................ 6
Vacating office under the constitution....................................................................................... 8

Removal under a provision of the constitution........................................................................... 9
Otherwise ceases to be a director............................................................................................... 12

No breach..................................................................................................................................... 13
Damages if there was a breach?................................................................................................ 14
Conclusion on termination........................................................................................................ 14

Did Regis breach an obligation to pay Dalkeith a $100,000 bonus?...................................... 14

Was an agreement made as alleged?....................................................................................... 15

Events preceding 7 May 2008.................................................................................................. 16
The conversation with Dr Folie................................................................................................ 18
Events after the conversation.................................................................................................... 18
Authority.................................................................................................................................. 20

Other arguments......................................................................................................................... 21
Conclusion on bonus.................................................................................................................. 22

Is Regis liable to pay Dalkeith damages for failure to issue it options?................................ 22

Was the promise to grant options subject to shareholder approval?................................. 23
The 650,000 options.................................................................................................................... 25
2007/2008 year............................................................................................................................ 26
2008/2009 year............................................................................................................................ 28
Conclusion on options............................................................................................................... 30

Conclusion......................................................................................................................................... 30

HIS HONOUR:

Introduction

  1. In August 2004, David Walker became managing director of Regis Resources Ltd (the defendant), a publicly listed, start-up mining company.  From 1 July 2005 onwards, his services as managing director of Regis were supplied by his family company, Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd (the plaintiff).  Those services were supplied under a services contract made between Regis and Dalkeith, initially for a term of two years until 30 June 2007 but then, by an amendment to the agreement, extended until 30 June 2009 (‘the services contract’).[1] 

    [1]Exhibit A, tab 47, pp 974-996 and tab 84, pp 1270-1271.

  1. On 4 May 2009, shortly before the expiry of the extended term, Mr…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd v Regis Resources Limited and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] VSC 288
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd took action against Regis Resources Limited, primarily challenging the validity of the termination of the plaintiff's contract for services as managing director and seeking compensation for the alleged failure to grant share options. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The court was tasked with determining whether the contract for services was validly terminated, whether the plaintiff was entitled to a contract bonus, and if there was a breach in the obligation to grant share options. The first issue involved examining whether the contract was lawfully terminated under the terms of the company's constitution and the Corporations Act. The second matter required scrutiny of whether an oral agreement existed for a contract bonus and whether the plaintiff had the authority to enter into such an agreement. The final point involved examining if there was an implied term that the obligation to grant share options was conditional upon shareholder approval.

The court concluded that the contract for services was validly terminated as the plaintiff had vacated office by ceasing to be a director, which was permissible under the Corporations Act. It was further determined that there was no oral agreement for a contract bonus, and thus, no entitlement to such a bonus. Regarding the share options, the court held that no breach of contract occurred as there was no implied term requiring shareholder approval, and no damages resulted from the failure to grant the options.

The court ordered that Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd was not entitled to any contract bonus or compensation for the failure to grant share options. The plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.