FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CULLEN & CULLEN | [2011] FMCAfam 375 |
| FAMILY LAW – Property – death of a party – s.79(8) Family Law Act 1975 – appointment of legal personal representative of deceased party – executor/administrator acquires title to a chose in action upon a grant of probate of the Will or letters of administration in the estate. |
| Family Law Act 1975, s.79(8) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, r.1.05 Family Law Rules 2004, rr.1.12, 6.05, 6.15 Superannuation Industry (Supervision)Act 1993, s.10 Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), ss.44 & 61 |
| Vuletic & Vuletic number PT700 of 1995 (unreported) Slater & Slater (1985) FLC 91-641 Strelys & Strelys (1987) FLC 91-827 Daily Pty Ltd v White (1946) 63 WN (NSW) 262 Nolan v Nolan & Ors [2004] VSCA 109 In the Marriage of GF & ER Strelys 12 FAMLR 437 Byers v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2001) 109 FCR 554 |
| Applicant: | MS CULLEN |
| Respondent: | MR CULLEN |
| File Number: | DUC 372 of 2009 |
| Judgment of: | Kemp FM |
| Hearing date: | 11 April 2011 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 11 April 2011 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 27 April 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Hodgson |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Booth Brown Samuels Olney |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Berry |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | M J Duffy & Son |
ORDERS
Pursuant to Rule 6.05 of the Family Law Rules 2004, Mr P is granted permission to intervene as a party, becoming the second applicant in the proceedings.
That upon grant of the Probate of the last Will of Ms Cullen dated
1 June 2009 appointing Mr P as an Executor and Trustee of the Estate of the first applicant and within 24 hours of a sealed copy of the said grant being provided to the Court, Mr P be substituted as the legal personal representative of the first applicant, pursuant to s.79(8) of the Family Law Act 1975 and at the same time be removed as the second applicant in the proceedings.
By consent, that leave be granted to the parties’ solicitors to inspect and if required, photocopy the exhibits tendered at the hearing of these proceedings by arrangement with the Associate to Federal Magistrate Kemp.
By consent, that the parties be granted liberty to restore on 7 days notice.
THE COURT NOTES
That a copy of the Death Certificate and Will of the late Ms Cullen have been produced to the Court as part of Exhibit “1” on the application.
The Court will reserve the position as to whether the parties will be required to attend a further conciliation conference.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Cullen & Cullen is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
DUC 372 of 2009
| MS CULLEN |
Applicant
And
| MR CULLEN |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
These are property proceedings which were heard in Dubbo on 26 & 27 October 2010 when the parties’…
Continue reading Cullen & Cullen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cullen & Cullen [2011] FMCAfam 375
- Case
- [2011] FMCAfam 375
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of the Family Law Rules 2004 and the Family Law Act 1975. Specifically, the court had to consider the procedural requirements for Mr P's intervention and substitution as the legal personal representative of Ms Cullen's estate, including the appropriate timing of these actions in relation to the grant of probate. The court was also required to consider the implications of these procedural steps on the ongoing proceedings and the rights of the parties involved.
The court granted permission for Mr P to intervene as a party, recognising the necessity of his involvement in the proceedings. The court determined that Mr P should be substituted as the legal personal representative of Ms Cullen's estate upon the grant of probate and the provision of a sealed copy of the grant to the court. This substitution would occur within 24 hours of the grant being provided. The court also allowed the parties' solicitors to inspect and, if necessary, photocopy the exhibits tendered at the hearing. Additionally, the court reserved the decision on whether a further conciliation conference would be required. The court's orders reflected a careful consideration of the procedural rules and the specific circumstances of the case, ensuring that the interests of all parties were appropriately addressed.
The final orders of the court included granting permission for Mr P to intervene as a party and subsequently substituting him as the legal personal representative of Ms Cullen's estate. The court also granted leave for the inspection and photocopying of exhibits and allowed the parties the liberty to restore on seven days' notice. The court reserved the position on the need for a further conciliation conference, indicating that this decision would be made at a later stage in the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Pursuant to Rule 6.05 of the Family Law Rules 2004, Mr P is granted permission to intervene as a party, becoming the second applicant in the proceedings.
2.
That upon grant of the Probate of the last Will of Ms Cullen dated
1 June 2009 appointing Mr P as an Executor and Trustee of the Estate of the first applicant and within 24 hours of a sealed copy of the said grant being provided to the Court, Mr P be substituted as the legal personal representative of the first applicant, pursuant to s.79(8) of the Family Law Act 1975 and at the same time be removed as the second applicant in the proceedings.
3.
By consent, that leave be granted to the parties’ solicitors to inspect and if required, photocopy the exhibits tendered at the hearing of these proceedings by arrangement with the Associate to Federal Magistrate Kemp.
4.
By consent, that the parties be granted liberty to restore on 7 days notice.
THE COURT NOTES
5.
That a copy of the Death Certificate and Will of the late Ms Cullen have been produced to the Court as part of Exhibit “1” on the application.
6.
The Court will reserve the position as to whether the parties will be required to attend a further conciliation conference.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.