DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Crutcher v Skewes [2010] QDC 382 PARTIES: CINDY KAY CRUTCHER
(Applicant)
vLEAHA TERESE SKEWES
(Respondent)FILE NO/S: 20/2010 DIVISION: Civil PROCEEDING: Application for criminal compensation ORIGINATING COURT: Beenleigh DELIVERED ON: 7 October, 2010 DELIVERED AT: Beenleigh HEARING DATE: 13 September, 2010 JUDGE: Dearden DCJ ORDER: The respondent Leaha Terese Skewes pay the applicant
Cindy Kay Crutcher the sum of $19,500.CATCHWORDS: Application – criminal compensation – assault occasioning
bodily harm – burglary with violence while armed – unlawful
wounding – bruising/laceration – facial disfigurement or
bodily scarring – fracture/loss of use of arm/wrist.LEGISLATION: Criminal Offence Victims Act (Qld) 1995 s. 24, s. 25(7), s.
40(1).Victims of Crime Assistance Act (Qld) 2009 s. 154. s. 155. CASES: Paterson v Chand & Chand [2008] QDC 214 COUNSEL: E Williams for the applicant
No appearance for the respondentsSOLICITORS: Colin Patino & Company Solicitors for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Introduction
The respondent, Leaha Terese Skewes, pleaded guilty before me in the Beenleigh District Court on 2 February 2007 to one count of assault occasioning bodily harm while armed, one count of burglary with violence while armed, and one count of unlawful wounding, all in respect of the applicant Cindy Kay Crutcher.
The respondent was sentenced to six months imprisonment in respect of the assault occasioning bodily harm count, two years imprisonment in respect of the burglary with violence while armed count, and two years imprisonment in respect of the unlawful wounding count. All sentences were concurrent and subject to a parole release date on the date of sentence (2 February 2007).[1]
[1] Exhibit CJP 3 (Sentencing Remarks) p.4, Affidavit of Colin Patino sworn 26 November 2009
Facts
The applicant, then 37, was a neighbour of the respondent. Prior to the offences, the applicant and the respondent had lived next door to each other for about 18 months and were initially on friendly terms, minding each other’s children and the respondent assisting the applicant with insulin injections.
In about September 2005, the friendship ended after an occasion when the applicant had friends over who stayed late into the night. The respondent became hostile towards the applicant and they stopped speaking. On 12 January 2006, the respondent came to the applicant’s front door and apologized to her and after this they began talking again and were on friendly terms, although not as friendly as previously.
At 4.30pm on 12 February 2006, the applicant was at the front of her unit sweeping leaves. The applicant was bending down behind some pot plants when she heard the respondent’s front door slam open and heard the respondent say “You want to laugh at me, I’ll give you something to laugh at, you fucking cunt.” The applicant then saw the respondent run along the fence between their units. The respondent ran into the applicant’s yard and screamed at her abusively, yelling “Are you laughing at me, cunt, are you laughing?” The applicant replied with words to the…
Continue reading Crutcher v Skewes
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Crutcher v Skewes [2010] QDC 382
- Case
- [2010] QDC 382
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the injuries sustained by the applicant were the result of the alleged assault by the respondent, and if so, whether they met the criteria for criminal injury compensation under the relevant Victorian legislation. The court had to assess the severity and impact of the injuries, as well as the circumstances surrounding the assault. The court also needed to consider whether the injuries met the statutory criteria for compensation, including whether they were caused by a criminal act and whether they resulted in specific types of harm.
The court examined the evidence presented, including medical reports and witness statements, and determined that the applicant's injuries were indeed caused by the assault by the respondent. The court found that the injuries met the statutory criteria for criminal injury compensation, as they included facial disfigurement or bodily scarring, and loss of use of a limb. The court awarded the applicant $19,500 in compensation. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant within 28 days of the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
The respondent Leaha Terese Skewes pay the applicant
Cindy Kay Crutcher the sum of $19,500.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.