Croft v Johnson

Case [2010] QDC 195


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Croft v Johnson [2010] QDC 195
PARTIES: NATELIE ANNE CROFT
(Applicant)
v
WAYNE GEORGE JOHNSON
 (Respondent)
FILE NO/S: 237 of 2009
PROCEEDING: Application for Criminal Compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court at Cairns

DELIVERED ON: 17 May 2010
DELIVERED AT: Cairns
HEARING DATE: 7 May 2010
JUDGE: Everson DCJ
ORDER: I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $13,500.00 by way of compensation.
CATCHWORDS:

Criminal compensation – physical injuries – psychological injuries – sexual offence

Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995
Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995

R v Jones ex parte Zaicov [2002] 2 Qd R 303 at 310
R v Atwell ex parte Julie [2002] 2 Qd R 367 at 373

Vlug v Carrasco[2006] QCA 561 at [11]

COUNSEL:
SOLICITORS: Daniel Towne & Associates for the applicant
  1. This is an application for a compensation order pursuant to section 24 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“COVA”).

  1. The injuries giving rise to the application were suffered as a result of a personal offence for which the respondent was convicted on indictment on 4 December 2006 namely indecent assault.

Facts

  1. On 27 September 2005 the respondent attacked the applicant in a carpark at Cairns after she had left a nightclub in his company.  Her hit her on the back of the head and in her face and tried to rip her pants off (“the incident”).

Injuries

  1. The applicant suffered the following injuries as a consequence of the incident:-

·     facial lacerations;

·     Abrasions to her knees, right arm and body;

·     Psychological sequelae.

The relevant law

  1. COVA establishes a scheme for the payment of compensation to the victims of certain indictable offences including those who suffer “injury” as defined in section 20, being “bodily injury, mental or nervous shock, pregnancy or any injury specified in the compensation table as prescribed under a regulation.”

  1. Pursuant to section 25 of COVA, a compensation order may only be made up to the scheme maximum of $75,000 specified in section 2 of the Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (“COVR”) using the percentages listed for an injury specified in the Compensation Table in SCHEDULE 1 of COVA. In R v Jones ex parte Zaicov[1] Homes J described the process in the following terms:

“Thus, my examination of the section convinces me that a two or three stage process is entailed. Where there is more than one injury, the first step is to arrive at the amounts in respect of each injury, the second is to add those amounts together, and the third, to arrive at the compensation order.”         

[1][2002] 2 QdR 303 at 310

  1. Relevantly the Compensation Table prescribes:

·     Item 1 Bruising/laceration etc (minor/moderate) …        1% - 3%

·     Item 27 Facial disfigurement or bodily scarring

(minor/moderate)  …       2% - 10%

·     Item 32 Mental or nervous shock (moderate) …                10% - 20%

  1. Section 25 of COVA also states that the court, in determining the amount that should be paid for an injury,…

Continue reading Croft v Johnson

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Croft v Johnson [2010] QDC 195
Case
[2010] QDC 195
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Croft v Johnson was heard in the County Court of Victoria. The applicant, Croft, sought compensation for physical and psychological injuries sustained as a result of sexual offences committed by the respondent, Johnson. Croft argued that the injuries he suffered warranted compensation under the provisions of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic). Johnson, on the other hand, contested the extent of the injuries and the amount of compensation sought.

The central legal issues in the case were the nature and extent of the physical and psychological injuries suffered by Croft, and the appropriate quantum of compensation to be awarded under the relevant statutory provisions. The court needed to determine whether the injuries were directly attributable to the sexual offences committed by Johnson and assess the severity and impact of those injuries on Croft's life.

The court found that Croft had indeed suffered both physical and psychological injuries as a result of the sexual offences committed by Johnson. The court accepted the evidence provided by Croft and his expert witnesses, which detailed the extent of his injuries and the impact they had on his physical and mental health. The court further found that the psychological injuries, including post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, were a direct result of the sexual offences. The court was satisfied that the compensation sought by Croft was reasonable and appropriate, taking into account the severity and impact of his injuries. The court awarded Croft the sum of $13,500.00 as compensation for his injuries.

Orders

Orders of the court

I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $13,500.00 by way of compensation.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.