Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Corcoran v Far [2020] NSWCA 140 Hearing dates: 26 June 2020 Decision date: 13 July 2020 Before: White JA;
Emmett AJADecision: The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — Leave to appeal – No error which goes beyond merely arguable – No issue of principle or question of public importance – Leave refused
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 83
Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 85, 90, 187
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101
Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164
Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Limited [1995] NSWCA 69
Collier v Lancer (No. 2) [2013] NSWCA 186
Corcoran v Far [2017] NSWCATCD 40
Corcoran v Far [2018] NSWCATAP 13
Corcoran v Far [2019] NSWSC 1284
Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132
Horseshoe Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Rixon [2018] NSWCA 121
Huang v Attapallil & Ors [2017] NSWCA 181
Lukaszewicz v Polish Club Ltd [2020] NSWCA 99
Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223
The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26
Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Aaron Corcoran (Applicant)
Peter Far (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Self-represented (Applicant)
Self-represented (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/332472 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Common Law Division
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 25 September 2019
- Before:
- McCallum J
- File Number(s):
- 2019/38799
Judgment
-
THE COURT: This is an application for leave to appeal from orders made in the Common Law Division on 25 September 2019.
-
On 20 November 2018 the primary judge (McCallum J) heard a summons seeking leave to appeal from the Appeal Panel of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Pursuant to s 83 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) such appeals are confined to questions of law and require leave. The primary judge dismissed that summons and made no orders as to costs (Corcoran v Far [2019] NSWSC 1284).
-
On 23 October 2019 the applicant filed a notice of intention to appeal. On 31 December 2019 he filed a summons seeking leave to appeal.
-
The application arises out of a tenancy dispute between the applicant and the respondent in 2016.
-
The respondent was the tenant of a two level, three-bedroom unit. The applicant responded to an advertisement on Gumtree to occupy one of the bedrooms as a subtenant on terms of “4 weeks deposit and 2 weeks rent” at $290 per week. The applicant moved into one of the bedrooms on 24 March 2016. The applicant asserted that he was promised exclusive use of the bathroom which was on the same level as his bedroom. The respondent denied ever making such…
Continue reading Corcoran v Far
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Corcoran v Far [2020] NSWCA 140
- Case
- [2020] NSWCA 140
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether to grant leave to appeal. Specifically, the court considered whether the applicant had demonstrated an error in the District Court's decision that went beyond merely arguable, or whether the case involved an issue of principle or a question of public importance.
The Court of Appeal found that no error had been demonstrated that was more than merely arguable, nor was there an issue of principle or a question of public importance raised by the case. Consequently, the court refused to grant leave to appeal.
The summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.