Corcoran v Far

Case [2020] NSWCA 140


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Corcoran v Far [2020] NSWCA 140
Hearing dates: 26 June 2020
Decision date: 13 July 2020
Before: White JA;
Emmett AJA
Decision:

The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — Leave to appeal – No error which goes beyond merely arguable – No issue of principle or question of public importance – Leave refused

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 83

Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 85, 90, 187

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101

Cases Cited:

Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164

Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Limited [1995] NSWCA 69

Collier v Lancer (No. 2) [2013] NSWCA 186

Corcoran v Far [2017] NSWCATCD 40

Corcoran v Far [2018] NSWCATAP 13

Corcoran v Far [2019] NSWSC 1284

Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132

Dean v Phung [2012] NSWCA 223

Horseshoe Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Rixon [2018] NSWCA 121

Huang v Attapallil & Ors [2017] NSWCA 181

Lukaszewicz v Polish Club Ltd [2020] NSWCA 99

Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223

The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26

White v Johnston (2015) 87 NSWLR 779; [2015] NSWCA 18

Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Aaron Corcoran (Applicant)
Peter Far (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
Self-represented (Applicant)
Self-represented (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/332472
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Common Law Division
Citation:

[2019] NSWSC 1284

Date of Decision:
25 September 2019
Before:
McCallum J
File Number(s):
2019/38799

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: This is an application for leave to appeal from orders made in the Common Law Division on 25 September 2019.

  2. On 20 November 2018 the primary judge (McCallum J) heard a summons seeking leave to appeal from the Appeal Panel of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Pursuant to s 83 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) such appeals are confined to questions of law and require leave. The primary judge dismissed that summons and made no orders as to costs (Corcoran v Far [2019] NSWSC 1284).

  3. On 23 October 2019 the applicant filed a notice of intention to appeal. On 31 December 2019 he filed a summons seeking leave to appeal.

  4. The application arises out of a tenancy dispute between the applicant and the respondent in 2016.

  5. The respondent was the tenant of a two level, three-bedroom unit. The applicant responded to an advertisement on Gumtree to occupy one of the bedrooms as a subtenant on terms of “4 weeks deposit and 2 weeks rent” at $290 per week. The applicant moved into one of the bedrooms on 24 March 2016. The applicant asserted that he was promised exclusive use of the bathroom which was on the same level as his bedroom. The respondent denied ever making such…

Continue reading Corcoran v Far

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Corcoran v Far [2020] NSWCA 140
Case
[2020] NSWCA 140
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Corcoran (the applicant) sought leave to appeal from a decision of the District Court of New South Wales against Far (the respondent). The nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed in the provided text.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether to grant leave to appeal. Specifically, the court considered whether the applicant had demonstrated an error in the District Court's decision that went beyond merely arguable, or whether the case involved an issue of principle or a question of public importance.

The Court of Appeal found that no error had been demonstrated that was more than merely arguable, nor was there an issue of principle or a question of public importance raised by the case. Consequently, the court refused to grant leave to appeal.

The summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.