Colser Investments Pty Ltd (Migration) [2022] AATA 4166 (12 September 2022)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Colser Investments Pty Ltd
REPRESENTATIVE: Mr Amber Gupta (MARN: 0533773)
CASE NUMBER: 1922897
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/872941
MEMBER:Jade Murphy
DATE:12 September 2022
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
Statement made on 12 September 2022 at 4:21pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination – approval of nominated position – Direct Entry nomination stream – Café or Restaurant Manager – tasks to be performed – no response to section 359(2) invitation – term of employment – decision under review affirmedLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 140GB, 140GBA, 359C, 360, 363AMigration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.72, 2.73
CASES
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 915
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 28
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18
Yang v MIAC [2010] FMCA 890STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 29 July 2019 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).
The applicant applied for approval on 23 February 2018. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in reg 5.19 of the Regulations which contains two alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition nomination stream (reg 5.19(3)) and a Direct Entry nomination stream (reg 5.19(4)). If the application is made in accordance with reg 5.19(2) and meets the requirements of either stream, then the application must be approved. If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: reg 5.19(5).
In this case, the applicant has applied for approval of a nomination, seeking to satisfy the criteria in the Direct Entry nomination stream.
The delegate refused the application on the basis the applicant’s nomination did not satisfy reg 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D) of the Regulations because the delegate was not satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated that the tasks to be performed by the nominee correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified in the relevant instrument.
On 17 August 2022, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and invited it to provide information to the Tribunal pursuant to s.359(2) of the Act. Specifically, the Tribunal invited information to be provided demonstrating that the business currently met all relevant criteria in r.5.19(4), including but not limited to, the criteria that the Department had found was not met. The Tribunal provided a copy of r.5.19(4) for reference. The Tribunal requested that the information be provided by 31 August 2022, noting that an extension of time to respond could be requested but that…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Colser Investments Pty Ltd (Migration) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] AATA 4166
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal was required to determine if the applicant had satisfied the criteria for approval of the nomination under regulation 5.19(4) of the Migration Regulations 1994. Specifically, the Tribunal needed to assess whether the nominating business had demonstrated sufficient financial capacity to employ the nominated person on a full-time basis for at least two years, as stipulated by regulation 5.19(4)(d).
In its reasoning, the Tribunal noted that the financial information provided was at least three years old and therefore could not be given any weight. Despite an invitation under section 359(2) of the Act to provide updated information demonstrating the business's financial capacity, the applicant failed to respond. Consequently, the Tribunal was not satisfied that the nominating business had the financial capacity to meet the employment requirements for the nominated position for the requisite two-year period. As this criterion under regulation 5.19(4)(d) was not met, the Tribunal did not need to consider the remaining requirements for approval.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision under review to refuse the nomination, finding that the applicant had not met the requirements of regulation 5.19(4). The applicant had also not sought to satisfy the criteria for the Temporary Residence Transition Nomination stream, thus failing to meet regulation 5.19(3).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.Jade MurphyMemberATTACHMENT - Extracts from the Migration Regulations 19945.19Approval of nominated positions (employer nomination)…(2)The application must:(a)be made in accordance with approved form 1395…; and(aa) include a written certification by the nominator stating whether or not the nominator has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act; and(b)be accompanied by the fee mentioned in regulation 5.37.…Direct Entry nomination(4)The Minister must, in writing, approve a nomination if:(a)the application for approval:(i) is made in accordance with subregulation (2); and(ii) identifies a need for the nominator to employ a paid employee to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control; and(b)the nominator:(i) is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia; and(ii) directly operates the business; and(c)for a nominator whose business activities include activities relating to the hiring of labour to other unrelated businesses — the position is within the business activities of the nominator and not for hire to other unrelated businesses; and(d)both of the following apply:(i) the employee will be employed on a full-time basis in the position for at least 2 years;(ii) the terms and conditions of the employee’s employment will not include an express exclusion of the possibility of extending the period of employment; and(e)the terms and conditions of employment applicable to the position will be no less favourable than the terms and conditions that:(i) are provided; or(ii) would be provided;to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident for performing equivalent work in the same workplace at the same location; and(f)either:(i) there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; or(ii) it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; and(g)the nominator has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the applicant operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to workplace relations; and(h)either:(i) all of the following apply:(A)the tasks to be performed in the position will be performed in Australia and correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph;(AA)there is a genuine need for the nominator to employ the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii), as a paid employee, to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control;(AAA)the occupation is applicable to the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii) in accordance with the specification of the occupation;(B)either:(I)the nominator’s business has operated for at least 12 months, and the nominator meets the requirements for the training of Australian citizens and Australian permanent residents that are specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-sub-subparagraph; or(II)the nominator’s business has operated for less than 12 months, and the nominator has an auditable plan for meeting the requirements specified in the instrument mentioned in sub-sub-subparagraph (I); or(ii) all of the following apply:(A)the position is located in regional Australia;(B)there is a genuine need for the nominator to employ the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii), as a paid employee, to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control;(C)the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident who is living in the same local area as that place;(D)the tasks to be performed in the position correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph;(DA)the occupation is applicable to the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii) in accordance with the specification of the occupation;(E)the business operated by the nominator is located at that place;(F)a body that is:(I)specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph; and(II)located in the same State or Territory as the location of the position;has advised the Minister about the matters mentioned in paragraph (e) and sub-subparagraphs (B) and (C).