Legal Research
Cases
Collins v Dart

Collins v Dart

Case [2022] VCC 1932

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Collins v Dart [2022] VCC 1932
Case: [2022] VCC 1932
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Collins v Dart [2022] VCC 1932

Most Recent Citation

TBLX and ZSCM and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2023] AATA 2059

Cases Citing This Decision

TBLX and ZSCM and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2023] AATA 2059
Citation 1 (Para 4)

…In a recent Victorian decision of Collins v Dart [2022] VCC 1932 the Court had to determine whether a payment was a loan or gift. The Court had to grapple with this in circumstances where one of the parties was deceased and there was limited written evidence of the transaction. As here there was an absence of rele…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466
Citation 1

…LR 89; Gray v Gray (2004) 12 BPR 22, 755; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150 ; Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466…
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1152
Citation 2 (Para 16)

…principles to which a Court should have regard in assessing the affidavit and oral evidence as set out in In the matter of Hillsea Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 1152 at [16]-[22]). It is noted that these principles include the well-known observation by McLelland CJ in Eq as to the fallibility of human memory over the pa…
Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150
Citation 3

…Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; Gray v Gray (2004) 12 BPR 22, 755; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150 ; Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466…
John Holland Pty Ltd v Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 451
Citation 4 (Para 94)

…he occurrence of any conversation propounded by a claimant’ (the defendant referring to John Holland Pty Limited v Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 451 at [94], per Hammerschlag J; and to the summary by Black J of the principles to which a Court should have regard in assessing the affidavit and oral eviden…
In the matter of an application for bail by PAUL HENDERSON [2008] ACTSC 109
Citation 5

…Cases Cited: Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; Gray v Gray (2004) 12 BPR 22, 755; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150 ; Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466…
Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22
Citation 6

…Cases Cited: Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; Gray v Gray (2004) 12 BPR 22, 755; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150 ; Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466…
Gray v Gray [2004] NSWCA 408
Citation 7

…Cases Cited: Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; Gray v Gray (2004) 12 BPR 22, 755; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group Pty Ltd v Stamford Aus-Trade & Press Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 150 ; Moore v Aubusson [2020] NSWSC 1466…
Watson v Foxman [1995] NSWCA 497
Citation 8

…ples include the well-known observation by McLelland CJ in Eq as to the fallibility of human memory over the passage of time in Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 (Watson v Foxman) at 319; and that weight should be accorded so far as possible to ‘contemporary materials, objectively established facts and the apparent…
Plunkett v Bull [1915] HCA 14
Citation 9

…ne must scrutinise carefully evidence as to oral conversations with deceased persons (see Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544 at 548-9, per Isaacs J; [1915] HCA 14), and, as in all such cases, I place relatively more weight on contemporaneous documents and the objective circumstances as a whole over the affidavit…
Harpur v Levy [2011] VSC 653
Citation 10 (Para 52)

…[1984] VR 65 at 78-79; See also Harpur v Levy [2011] VSC 653 at [52] – [53]…
Richardson v Armistead [2000] VSC 551
Citation 11 (Para 36)

…[7] See for example Richardson v Armistead [2000] VSC 551 at [36] (per Hansen J) citing Morrissy v…

AI Chat coming soon