Set aside by Appeal:
Set aside by Appeal on 27 September 2006
(Sunol v Collier (EOD) [2006] NSW ADTAP 51)
CITATION: Collier v Sunol (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 88 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division PARTIES: APPLICANT
Henry Collier
RESPONDENT
John Christopher SunolFILE NUMBER: 051037 HEARING DATES: 09/02/06 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/09/2006
DATE OF DECISION:
03/24/2006BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Gill M - Non Judicial Member; Groth D - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: Vilification - Homosexual MATTER FOR DECISION: Remedies and Costs LEGISLATION CITED: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic)CASES CITED: Borg v Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services & Anor [2003] NSWADT 35
Burns v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2005] NSWADT 24
Cleary Bros (Bombo) Pty Ltd v Cvetkovski (EOD) [2001] NSWADTAP 10
Collier v Sunol [2005] NSWADT 261
Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries [2005] VCAT 1159
Jordan v North Cost Area Health Service (No 3) [2005] NSWADT 296REPRESENTATION: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
S Pritchard, barrister
In personORDERS: 1. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this decision, the Respondent is to remove from every website controlled by him any material concerning homosexual men, lesbians, homosexuality or the gay lobby; 2. The Respondent is to refrain from publishing material on any of these topics on any website, whether or not controlled by him; 3. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this decision, the Respondent is to post the statement set out in subparagraph (3) of paragraph [44] of these reasons on every website controlled by him, and in addition on the websites known as web-ministry.com and wollongongmusicscene.com; 4. The Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs of these proceedings, in a sum to be agreed within sixty (60) days of the date of this decision or, failing agreement, to be assessed pursuant to the Legal Profession Act 2004.
Introduction
1 In these proceedings, the Applicant, Mr Henry Collier, alleged that material published by the Respondent, Mr John Sunol, on the internet during September and October 2004 vilified homosexual people contrary to provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (‘the ADA’).
2 According to Mr Collier, Mr Sunol published this material in two ways: by including it in material published on websites controlled by him and by contributing it to websites controlled by others, notably two websites called web-ministry.com and wollongongmusicscene.com. All the websites involved were accessible to the general public without a password.
3 We heard Mr Collier’s application on 28 September 2005. In a decision delivered on 17 November 2005 (Collier v Sunol [2005] NSWADT 261), we upheld his claim of unlawful vilification with respect to five statements that were set out in his Points of Claim. We dismissed it with respect to a further three statements.
4 We directed that there should be a further hearing dealing with the orders, if any, that we should make (a) by way of remedy for Mr Collier and (b) on account…
Continue reading Collier v Sunol (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Collier v Sunol (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 88
- Case
- [2006] NSWADT 88
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the publications made by Mr Sunol constituted vilification under the Anti-Discrimination Act, and if so, whether they were made in a way that was likely to incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, homosexual men, lesbians, homosexuality, or the gay lobby. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate remedy for the Applicant's claim of vilification.
Justice Bromberg found that Mr Sunol's publications were indeed vilifying as they encouraged hatred and contempt towards homosexual men, lesbians, homosexuality, and the gay lobby. The court held that Mr Sunol's publications were made in a manner that was likely to incite hatred, serious contempt, or severe ridicule towards these groups. As a result, the court granted Mr Collier an injunction prohibiting Mr Sunol from publishing any material on these topics on any website, as well as ordering Mr Sunol to remove the existing material from the websites under his control. Furthermore, the court ordered Mr Sunol to post a statement of apology on the relevant websites. Lastly, the court ordered Mr Sunol to pay Mr Collier's costs of the proceedings.
In summary, the court found Mr Sunol's publications to be vilifying and granted Mr Collier an injunction against any future publications on the same topics, ordered Mr Sunol to remove existing material, and required him to post a statement of apology on the websites in question. Mr Sunol was also ordered to pay Mr Collier's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this decision, the Respondent is to remove from every website controlled by him any material concerning homosexual men, lesbians, homosexuality or the gay lobby; 2. The Respondent is to refrain from publishing material on any of these topics on any website, whether or not controlled by him; 3. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this decision, the Respondent is to post the statement set out in subparagraph (3) of paragraph [44] of these reasons on every website controlled by him, and in addition on the websites known as web-ministry.com and wollongongmusicscene.com; 4. The Respondent is to pay the Applicant’s costs of these proceedings, in a sum to be agreed within sixty (60) days of the date of this decision or, failing agreement, to be assessed pursuant to the Legal Profession Act 2004.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.