Clement v Comcare

Case [2011] FCA 404


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Clement v Comcare [2011] FCA 404

Citation: Clement v Comcare [2011] FCA 404
Appeal from: Clement and Comcare [2010] AATA 296
Parties: KRISTINE CLEMENT v COMCARE
File number: ACD 18 of 2010
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for an adjournment under s 38D(5) of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (‘the Act’) – application for a national security information hearing under s 38A of the Act – whether s 6A of the Act acts as a ‘trigger’ – Act does not apply to civil proceedings until the Attorney General notifies the parties under s 6A – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 12, 15AB Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44
Federal Court Rules O 19 r 1
National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) ss 3, 6, 6A, 7, 15A, 38A, 38D, 38F, 46A-46G
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 16, 19
Cases cited: Bushell v Hammond [1904] 2 KB 563
Bushell v Hammond [1904] 73 LJ KB 1005
Chandler v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 763
Clement and Comcare [2010] AATA 296
Frauenfelder v Reid (1963) 109 CLR 42
Joyce v Paton (1941) 58 WN (NSW) 88
R v Schildkamp [1971] AC 1
Re Baldwin (1891) 12 LR (NSW) 128
Sanderson v Fotheringham (1885) 11 VLR 190
The Ombudsman v Moroney [1983] 1 NSWLR 317
Date of hearing: 5 April 2011
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 49
Counsel for the Appellant: Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr T Begbie, Australian Government Solicitor

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

ACD 18 of 2010

ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN:

KRISTINE CLEMENT
Appellant

AND:

COMCARE
Respondent

JUDGE:

COWDROY J

DATE OF ORDER:

21 APRIL 2011

WHERE MADE:

CANBERRA

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The appeal proceedings not be adjourned pursuant to s 38D(5) of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (‘the Act’).

2.A national security information hearing not be convened under s 38A of the Act.

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

1.The Act has no application to the appeal proceedings unless the Attorney-General notifies the parties and the Court pursuant to s 6A(1) of the Act.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

ACD 18 of 2010

ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN:

KRISTINE CLEMENT
Appellant

AND:

COMCARE
Respondent

JUDGE:

COWDROY J

DATE:

21 APRIL 2011

PLACE:

CANBERRA

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Ms Clement (‘the appellant’) filed a notice of appeal on 20 May 2010 under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) (‘the AAT Act’) with respect to…

Continue reading Clement v Comcare

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Clement v Comcare [2011] FCA 404
Case
[2011] FCA 404
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Clement, the appellant, filed an appeal against a decision made by Comcare, the respondent, and applied for an adjournment under section 38D(5) of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (the Act) as well as for a national security information hearing under section 38A of the Act. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was tasked with deciding whether section 6A of the Act acted as a trigger for the application of the Act in this case.

The court had to determine whether section 6A of the Act served as a trigger that activated the application of the Act in civil proceedings. The Act does not apply to civil proceedings unless the Attorney-General notifies the parties and the court under section 6A(1) of the Act. The court also needed to assess the appropriateness of an adjournment under section 38D(5) of the Act and the convening of a national security information hearing under section 38A of the Act.

The court found that the Act did not apply to the appeal proceedings in this case as there had been no notification by the Attorney-General under section 6A(1) of the Act. Therefore, the application for an adjournment under section 38D(5) of the Act was dismissed, and a national security information hearing was not convened under section 38A of the Act. The court declared that the Act has no application to the appeal proceedings unless the Attorney-General notifies the parties and the court in accordance with section 6A(1) of the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal proceedings not be adjourned pursuant to s 38D(5) of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (‘the Act’).

2. A national security information hearing not be convened under s 38A of the Act.

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

1. The Act has no application to the appeal proceedings unless the Attorney-General notifies the parties and the Court pursuant to s 6A(1) of the Act.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.