DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Cho v Hui and Anor [2023] QDC 155
PARTIES:
KWON HYUN CHO
(plaintiff)v
DAVID SINGEE HUI
(first defendant)and
ALLIANZ AUSTRALIA INSURANCE LIMITED (ABN 15 000 122 850)
(second defendant)FILE NO:
1873/22
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Civil
DELIVERED ON:
13 September 2023
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
27 and 28 April, 4 May and 12 September 2023 (written submissions dated 9 and 11 May 2023)
JUDGE:
Rosengren DCJ
ORDER:
JUDGMENT FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN THE SUM OF $55,505
CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – GENERAL DAMAGES – where the plaintiff suffered physical injuries in a motor vehicle accident – where liability is admitted by the defendants – whether the plaintiff was a witness of credit – where damages are assessed under the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) – where there is a dispute as to the consequences of the injuries caused by the accident – whether the plaintiff’s dominant injury is to his lower back – where the parties are in dispute as to the appropriate level of ISV
DAMAGES – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY – where the effect on employment in issue – whether the evidence justified an award of economic loss – the appropriate method of allowing a global component
Little v McCarthy & Anor [2014] QSC 274
Meechan v Savco Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2021] QCA 264
New South Wales v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133
Nilon v Bezzina [1988] 2 Qd R 420
Paff v Speed (1961) 105 CLR 549Paul & Anor v Rendell (1981) 35 ALR 569
Perfect v MacDonald & Anor [2012] QSC 11Qantas Airways Limited v Fisher [2014] QCA 329
Reardon-Smith v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2007] QCA 211
Yammine v Kalwy [1979] 2 NSWLR 151
Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) s 51, 55, 60(1)(a), 60(3), 62
Civil Liability Regulation 2014 (Qld) s 6, Sch 4, Sch 7COUNSEL: R Green for the plaintiff
M Williams for the defendantsSOLICITORS: Emmanuel Lawyers for the plaintiff
McInnes Wilson Lawyers for the defendants
Introduction
In November 2020, the plaintiff and the first defendant were involved in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff claims he sustained injuries to his neck, shoulders and lower back. In August last year, the plaintiff commenced this proceeding against the defendants for damages and other orders. Liability has been admitted but quantum remains in dispute. The assessment is governed by the provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) (‘the Act’) and the Civil Liability Regulation 2014 (Qld) (‘the Regulation’).
In April and May this year the trial was heard over three days. The first language of the plaintiff and his wife is Korean. They gave their evidence with the assistance of an interpreter. The only other lay witness to give evidence was the first defendant. Expert evidence was given by two orthopaedic surgeons, namely Drs Wallace and Fitzpatrick.
Detailed written submissions have been provided by the parties. They were supplemented with oral…
Continue reading Cho v Hui
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cho v Hui [2023] QDC 155
- Case
- [2023] QDC 155
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the credibility of the plaintiff, Cho, and found him to be a witness of credit. The court concluded that the plaintiff's dominant injury was to his lower back. Regarding the level of ISV, the court determined that the plaintiff's evidence justified an award, applying a global component to account for the overall impact of the injuries on his life. The court awarded damages for general damages and loss of earning capacity, taking into account the evidence presented.
In assessing the measure of damages, the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a total sum of $55,505. This amount included compensation for general damages and loss of earning capacity. The judgment provided a comprehensive assessment of the plaintiff's injuries and their consequences, ensuring that the plaintiff received appropriate compensation for his losses.
Orders
Orders of the court
JUDGMENT FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN THE SUM OF $55,505
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.