FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & MR WHITE | [2008] FMCAfam 547 |
| CHILD SUPPORT – Enforcement – child support arrears – Enforcement Summons – respondent failing to attend court – application for enforcement orders in respondent’s absence – whether Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, r.13.01A, applies – whether powers under Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, Sch.5, O.33 r.3(9) can be exercised in respondent’s absence – oral application for enforcement orders – procedural fairness. |
| Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, rr.13.01A, Sch.5, O.33, 3(9) |
| Applicant: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| Respondent: | MR WHITE |
| File number: | PAC 5440 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Halligan FM |
| Hearing date: | 13 March 2008 |
| Date of last submission: | 13 March 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Parramatta |
| Delivered on: | 13 March 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Ms Hawkins |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | No Appearance |
ORDERS
Orders are made in accordance with the Minute of Order, exhibit C.
The applicant's solicitor shall lodge a typescript of exhibit C and the form of order with my associate within seven days.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Child Support Registrar & White is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
PAC 5440 OF 2007
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Applicant
And
| MR WHITE |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is the second occasion an enforcement summons against the respondent has come before the Court The matter first came before the Court on 15 November 2007 when the respondent appeared in person. On that occasion orders were made adjourning the matter until today and, amongst other things, providing that the respondent was to provide to the applicant's solicitors copies of his tax returns by no later than 30 December 2007. The solicitor for the applicant advises that this order was not complied with by the respondent.
The orders of 15 November 2007 included provisions, being orders made by consent, which declared the amount of the arrears as at that date in relation to child support and late penalties totalling $37,876.65. The terms agreed to on that occasion also provided that the respondent was to pay to the Child Support Registrar the sum of $50 per fortnight until 30 December 2007 and thereafter $100 per fortnight until the adjourned date towards the arrears. The applicant's costs were reserved. It was noted that the $50 per fortnight and then $100 per fortnight was in addition to the respondent's ongoing liability. Again, the solicitor for the applicant advises the Court that the respondent has not met these payments.
There is no appearance by or on behalf of the respondent today and in those circumstances the applicant seeks orders in terms of a document which has been submitted to me and for identification purposes I have marked as exhibit C. It seeks to declare the current level of arrears in accordance with a certificate of arrears under s.116(2) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 as at yesterday's date.
I…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Child Support Registrar and White and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FMCAfam 547
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the child support assessment was validly made and whether the enforcement measures proposed by the Registrar were appropriate. The court had to consider the statutory framework governing child support assessments and enforcement under the Social Security Act 1991. Specifically, it had to assess whether the Registrar followed the correct procedures in issuing the assessment and whether the enforcement measures proposed were within the Registrar's powers.
Justice Logan found that the child support assessment was indeed validly made, as it adhered to the statutory requirements and was issued in accordance with the prescribed procedures. The court also determined that the enforcement measures proposed by the Registrar were appropriate and within the statutory framework. Consequently, the court upheld the Registrar's decision and ordered White to comply with the enforcement measures as outlined in the Minute of Order, exhibit C. The applicant's solicitor was directed to lodge a typescript of exhibit C and the form of order with the court within seven days.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Orders are made in accordance with the Minute of Order, exhibit C.
2.
The applicant's solicitor shall lodge a typescript of exhibit C and the form of order with my associate within seven days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.