Child Support Registrar and Scully

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & SCULLY [2009] FMCAfam 1233
CHILD SUPPORT – Enforcement – child support arrears – enforcement summons – Order 33 rule 9.
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, s.100
Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988, s.116(2)
Family Law Act 1975, s.117
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, rr.21.10, 25B.05, Schedules 1 and 5
Child Support Registrar & F & M Pty Ltd [2007] FMCAfam 477
Child Support Registrar & White [2008] FMCAfam 547
Stephens & Stephens [2007] FamCA 680
Applicant: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
Respondent: MR SCULLY
File Number: SYC3690 of 2009
Judgment of: Sexton FM
Hearing dates: 16 October & 16 November 2009
Date of Last Submission: 16 November 2009
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 24 November 2009

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms V. McWilliam
Solicitors for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitors
Solicitors for the Respondent: In person

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

  1. As at 16 November 2009 there is owing to the Commonwealth in respect of amounts owing under the registered maintenance liabilities of the Respondent the sum of $37,572.37 (being $30,907.46 in arrears of child support and $6,664.91 in late payment penalties).

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The Respondent pay the sum of $37,572.37 to the Child Support Registrar within 3 calendar months.

  2. The Respondent pay the Child Support Registrar’s costs in the sum of $6,000 within 3 calendar months.

  3. Pending compliance with Orders (2) and (3), the Respondent in his capacity as a director of Scully & Co Pty Limited, [Scully] Nominees Pty Ltd, [P] Pty Ltd and [D] Pty Ltd be restrained from resigning as a Director, voluntarily winding up or deregistering any of the companies, or effecting any change in the shareholdings of the companies without the prior written consent of the applicant or leave of the Court.  

  4. Pending compliance with Orders (2) and (3), the Respondent, in his capacity as a Director of [Scully] Nominees Pty Ltd, the trustee of the [V] Trust, (the trustee company) be restrained from doing any act or thing so as to enable the trustee company to further encumber, sell or otherwise deal with any of the assets of [V] Trust, without the prior written consent of the Applicant, or leave of the Court.

  5. All other outstanding applications be dismissed.

IT IS NOTED

that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym
is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).


Child Support Registrar & Scully
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYC3690 of 2009

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Applicant

And

MR SCULLY

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This matter concerns enforcement of a debt owed by the Respondent to the Commonwealth for child support arrears in relation to the Respondent’s children, [X] aged 16 years, [Y] aged 13 years and [Z] aged 11 years.

  2. The Applicant Child Support Registrar was represented by


    Ms McWilliam of counsel. The Respondent was unrepresented.

  3. The Child Support Registrar filed an enforcement summons on


    23 June 2009. The Registrar seeks a declaration that…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Child Support Registrar and Scully and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2009] FMCAfam 1233
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit Court, the Child Support Registrar brought a claim against Scully for unpaid child support. The Registrar sought an order for Scully to pay the outstanding child support arrears, along with associated costs, and sought an injunction to prevent Scully from making certain corporate changes without court approval. The court was tasked with determining whether the Registrar had correctly calculated the child support arrears and if the injunction was necessary to ensure payment.

The court examined the Registrar's calculations and confirmed that the arrears owed were correctly assessed. It also found that the injunction was necessary to prevent Scully from dissipating assets and thereby avoiding payment of the child support debt. The court determined that the Registrar's calculations were accurate and that the injunction was appropriate to safeguard the child support arrears.

Consequently, the court ordered Scully to pay the specified amount to the Registrar within three months, along with associated costs. Additionally, pending payment, the court restrained Scully from making any changes to the shareholdings or asset encumbrances of certain companies without the Registrar's consent or court approval. All other applications were dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

2.

The Respondent pay the sum of $37,572.37 to the Child Support Registrar within 3 calendar months.

3.

The Respondent pay the Child Support Registrar’s costs in the sum of $6,000 within 3 calendar months.

4.

Pending compliance with Orders (2) and (3), the Respondent in his capacity as a director of Scully & Co Pty Limited, [Scully] Nominees Pty Ltd, [P] Pty Ltd and [D] Pty Ltd be restrained from resigning as a Director, voluntarily winding up or deregistering any of the companies, or effecting any change in the shareholdings of the companies without the prior written consent of the applicant or leave of the Court.

5.

Pending compliance with Orders (2) and (3), the Respondent, in his capacity as a Director of [Scully] Nominees Pty Ltd, the trustee of the [V] Trust, (the trustee company) be restrained from doing any act or thing so as to enable the trustee company to further encumber, sell or otherwise deal with any of the assets of [V] Trust, without the prior written consent of the Applicant, or leave of the Court.

6.

All other outstanding applications be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.