Cesar Dario Montenegro v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales

Case [2016] HCASL 36


CESAR DARIO MONTENEGRO

v

PROTHONOTARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES

[2016] HCASL 36
S22/2016

  1. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.  Accordingly, an appeal to this Court would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. 

  2. Pursuant to r 41.10.5 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

G.A.A. Nettle
6 April 2016
M.M. Gordon
Details
AGLC
Cesar Dario Montenegro v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales [2016] HCASL 36
Case
[2016] HCASL 36
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cesar Dario Montenegro appealed against a decision of the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which had dismissed his application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. The Court of Appeal had upheld the Prothonotary's decision. Montenegro's appeal was against the dismissal of his application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which had rejected his claim for a writ of prohibition. The legal issues the court was required to decide related to whether the Court of Appeal had correctly exercised its discretion in denying Montenegro's application for special leave to appeal, and whether the appeal to the High Court enjoyed sufficient prospects of success. The court found that the Court of Appeal had exercised its discretion correctly in dismissing Montenegro's application for special leave to appeal, and that the appeal did not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The court noted that the Court of Appeal had considered all relevant factors and had reached a decision that was not unreasonable. The court also found that the appeal did not raise any significant legal issues that were not already considered by the Court of Appeal. The final orders of the court were that the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.