Legal Research
Cases
CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Black

CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Black

Case [2022] VCC 51

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Black [2022] VCC 51
Case: [2022] VCC 51
Decision Date: 31 January 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Black [2022] VCC 51

Most Recent Citation

Black v The Queen [2022] VSCA 125

Cases Citing This Decision

Black v The Queen [2022] VSCA 125
Citation 1 (Para 3)

…being committed over a ‘much shorter period of time and involved [her] receiving far less money by dishonest means’.[3] [2] DPP (Cth) v Black [2022] VCC 51, [20] ( ‘ Sentencing Reasons’). [3]Ibid [22].…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161
Citation 1 (Para 159)

…CA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported) at 7-8; approved in Ivanovic v R [2009] NSWCCA 28 at [11]-[13]. Compare R v Grice [2006]…
De Faria v The State of Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116
Citation 2 (Para 44)

…at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported) at 7-8; approved in Ivanovic v R [2009] NSWCCA 28 at…
Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45
Citation 3

…es of totality, parity and consistency are relevant when calculating federal sentences;[2] [2] Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45. d.The pre-eminent sentencing consideration in cases of social security fraud is general deterrence.[3] [3] R v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273 at [26] (Nettl…
R v Thomson [2009] SASC 237
Citation 4

…sions.[7] [7] Dickinson v R [2021] VCSA 50; Yarak v R [2008] NSWCCA 298; Ord v R (2008) 186 A Crim R 475; Johnsson v R [2007] NSWCCA 192; R v Thomson [2009] SASC 237; R v Buggy [2006] ACTCA 20.…
Ivanovic v R [2009] NSWCCA 28
Citation 5 (Para 11)

…ia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported) at 7-8; approved in Ivanovic v R [2009] NSWCCA 28 at [11]-[13]. Compare R v Grice [2006] QCA 326.…
Yarak v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 298
Citation 6

…as provided with a series of comparative sentences in the annexure to the Crown's written submissions.[7] [7] Dickinson v R [2021] VCSA 50; Yarak v R [2008] NSWCCA 298; Ord v R (2008) 186 A Crim R 475; Johnsson v R [2007] NSWCCA 192; R v Thomson [2009] SASC 237; R v Buggy [2006] ACTCA 20.…
McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80
Citation 7 (Para 44)

…(2000) 9 Tas R 144 at [28]; R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405 at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreporte…
Johnsson v R [2007] NSWCCA 192
Citation 8

…e to the Crown's written submissions.[7] [7] Dickinson v R [2021] VCSA 50; Yarak v R [2008] NSWCCA 298; Ord v R (2008) 186 A Crim R 475; Johnsson v R [2007] NSWCCA 192; R v Thomson [2009] SASC 237; R v Buggy [2006] ACTCA 20.…
R v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273
Citation 9 (Para 26)

…ones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45. d.The pre-eminent sentencing consideration in cases of social security fraud is general deterrence.[3] [3] R v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273 at [26] (Nettle JA) citing DPP (Cth) v Milne [2001] VSCA 93 at [12]-[13]; Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5 at [25]-[27]. e.Appellate courts have state…
R v Buggy [2006] ACTCA 20
Citation 10

…[2021] VCSA 50; Yarak v R [2008] NSWCCA 298; Ord v R (2008) 186 A Crim R 475; Johnsson v R [2007] NSWCCA 192; R v Thomson [2009] SASC 237; R v Buggy [2006] ACTCA 20.…
R v Grice [2006] QCA 326
Citation 11 (Para 11)

…CCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported) at 7-8; approved in Ivanovic v R [2009] NSWCCA 28 at [11]-[13]. Compare R v Grice [2006] QCA 326.…
R v Hurst; ex parte [2005] QCA 25
Citation 12 (Para 7)

…4 at [37]-[45]; Hrasky v Boyd (2000) 9 Tas R 144 at [28]; R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405 at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015] NSWCCA 161 at [49] [5] R v Purdon (N…
DPP (Cth) v Alateras [2004] VSCA 214
Citation 13

…nces’.[1] [1]Referring to Holdsworth QCA No 94 of 1993; Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404; Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5; DPP v Alateras [2004] VSCA 214. b.The offending on Charge 1 is serious, as reflected by the maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. The offending on Charge 2 is moderately serious;…
R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378
Citation 14 (Para 13)

…ted); Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404 at [37]-[45]; Hrasky v Boyd (2000) 9 Tas R 144 at [28]; R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405 at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia [2013] WASCA 116 at [159]; Zaky v R [2015]…
Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5
Citation 15

…here are ‘exceptional circumstances’.[1] [1]Referring to Holdsworth QCA No 94 of 1993; Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404; Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5; DPP v Alateras [2004] VSCA 214. b.The offending on Charge 1 is serious, as reflected by the maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. The offending on Char…
DPP (Cth) v Milne [2001] VSCA 93
Citation 16 (Para 12)

…consideration in cases of social security fraud is general deterrence.[3] [3] R v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273 at [26] (Nettle JA) citing DPP (Cth) v Milne [2001] VSCA 93 at [12]-[13]; Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5 at [25]-[27]. e.Appellate courts have stated that a sentence of imprisonment is ordinarily likely to be…
R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405
Citation 17 (Para 28)

…v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported); Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404 at [37]-[45]; Hrasky v Boyd (2000) 9 Tas R 144 at [28]; R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405 at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 at [44]; De Faria v Western Australia…
Hrasky v Boyd [2000] TASSC 39
Citation 18 (Para 37)

…Cameron (SACCA, 19 July 1993, unreported) at 4-5; R v Purdon (NSW CCA, 27 March 1997, unreported); Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404 at [37]-[45]; Hrasky v Boyd (2000) 9 Tas R 144 at [28]; R v Howe [2000] NSWCCA 405 at [13]-[14]; R v Aller [2004] NSWCCA 378 at [7]-[10]; R v Hurst [2005] QCA 25; McGuiness v R [2008]…
Kovacevic v Mills [2000] SASC 106
Citation 19

…arily likely to be required’ unless there are ‘exceptional circumstances’.[1] [1]Referring to Holdsworth QCA No 94 of 1993; Kovacevic v Mills (2000) 76 SASR 404; Ralph v Nawrojee [2003] WASCA 5; DPP v Alateras [2004] VSCA 214. b.The offending on Charge 1 is serious, as reflected by the maximum penalty of 10 years' im…

AI Chat coming soon