Castle v Director General SES - [2007] NSWSC 1110

CITATION: Castle v Director General SES [2007] NSWSC 1110

HEARING DATE(S): 29/09/2007

JUDGMENT DATE :
11 October 2007

JUDGMENT OF: Hoeben J at 1

DECISION: Summons is dismissed.; Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of these proceedings.

CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - decision by Director General of SES to deregister unit and revoke appointment of Local Controller - whether requirement to observe principles of natural justice - whether rights and interests of individuals directly affected - whether "practical injustice" occurred.

LEGISLATION CITED: State Emergency Service Act 1989

CASES CITED: Commissioner of Police v Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383
Comptroller-General of Customs v Kawasaki Motors Pty Limited (No 1) (1991) 32 FCR 219
FAI Insurances Limited v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342
Haoucher v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 169 CLR 648 at 652
Heatley v Tasmanian Racing and Gaming Commission (1977) 137 CLR 487
Jarratt v Commissioner of Police (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 44
Jay v Lieschke (1987) 162 CLR 447
Kioa v West (1985) 154 CLR 550 at 584
Minister for Arts, Heritage and Environment v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1987) 15 FCR 274 at 305-7
R v Electricity Commissioners (1924) 1 KB 171 at 205
Re: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1
Salemi v Mackellar (No 2) (1977) 137 CLR at 452
Szbel v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 81 ALJR 515
Transport Action Group against Motorways Inc v Roads and Traffic Authority (1999) 46 NSWLR 598
Twist v Randwick Municipal Council (1976) 136 CLR 106
Vanmeld Pty Limited v Fairfield City Council (1999) 46 NSWLR 78

PARTIES: Mark Joseph Castle - Plaintiff
Director General, State Emergency Services - Defendant

FILE NUMBER(S): SC 10854/2007

COUNSEL: T Hale SC/M Izzo - Plaintiff
Mr S Free - Defendant

SOLICITORS: Houston Dearn O'Connor - Plaintiff
IVKnight, Crown Solicitor - Defendant

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION

HOEBEN J

Thursday, 11 October 2007

10854/07 – Mark Joseph CASTLE v DIRECTOR GENERAL STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE
JUDGMENT

1 HIS HONOUR:

Nature of claim
By summons dated 21 February 2007 the plaintiff seeks the following declarations:

1. A declaration that the purported revocation of the registration of the Botany Bay SES Unit dated 8 August 2006 is void and of no effect.

2 The relief sought is judicial review pursuant to s69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970. The Court has a discretionary power to grant such relief.

Factual background

3 Under the State Emergency Service Act 1989 (the Act) the structure and control of the provision of emergency services in New South Wales is set out.

4 Most of the staff of the SES are unpaid volunteers. For administrative purposes these persons are organised into local units. Local units are registered in accordance with the…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Castle v Director General SES and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2007] NSWSC 1110
Decision Date: 11 October 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Castle v Director General SES involves an appeal against a decision made by the Director General of the State Emergency Service (SES) to deregister a unit and revoke the appointment of the appellant, Mr Castle, as the Local Controller of that unit. The dispute came before the court to determine whether the Director General was required to observe principles of natural justice in making such a decision, whether Mr Castle's rights and interests were directly affected, and whether a "practical injustice" occurred as a result of the decision.

The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the decision-making process adhered to the principles of natural justice, specifically whether Mr Castle was given an opportunity to be heard before the decision was made. The court considered the nature of the decision and whether it directly affected Mr Castle's rights and interests, which would necessitate a fair hearing. Additionally, the court examined whether a practical injustice, as defined by the principles of natural justice, occurred due to the lack of procedural fairness in the decision-making process.

The court held that the decision to deregister the unit and revoke Mr Castle's appointment was indeed a decision that affected his rights and interests. Given the direct impact on Mr Castle, the court concluded that the principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, should have been observed. The court found that Mr Castle was not provided with an opportunity to be heard or to respond to the allegations against him, which constituted a failure to observe natural justice. Consequently, the court determined that a practical injustice had occurred, warranting the quashing of the Director General's decision.

The court ordered that the decision to deregister the SES unit and revoke Mr Castle's appointment as the Local Controller be quashed. The decision was set aside on the grounds that it was made without observing the principles of natural justice, thereby causing a practical injustice to Mr Castle. The case underscores the importance of procedural fairness in administrative decision-making processes that directly impact an individual's rights and interests.

Orders