Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1168 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPODNENT
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd
North Sydney CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 11010 of 2005 CORAM: Bly C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- demolition of existing buildings multi-storey commercial/residential building, LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 468
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWCA 164
Castle Constructions Pty Limited v North Sydney Council & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 137
Nuts 'n Berries v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 516DATES OF HEARING: 29 and 30 November, 2 December 2007 and 16, 17, 18, 23 and 25 January and 1 May 2008.
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
7 May 2008LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr. T. Robertson, SC
Instructed by Ms Read
of McLauchlan Thorpe Partners.RESPONDENT
Miss H. Irish
Instructed by Mr. M. Jaku
of Mallesons Stephen Jaques.
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESBly C
7 May 2008
JUDGMENT11010 of 2005 Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council
Introduction
1 This is the second appeal/merits review of the respondent council's refusal of a development application for a mixed-use development at 136-140 Walker Street, North Sydney. The original appeal/merits review by Roseth SC in January 2006, refusing the application, was subsequently set aside by Talbot J (Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 468).
2 The proposed development comprises the demolition of two residential flat buildings and the erection of a 36 storey mixed use development containing 104 dwellings above a commercial podium of three and five levels There are to be five basement levels with parking for 110 vehicles. The building is to be about 100m in height with the topmost point of the tower rising to RL162.50. The tower is set back over 7m from Walker Street and 3m from the northern and southern boundaries of the site
3 Situated on the west side of Walker Street, the site has a frontage of 28.84m, a depth of about 40m, an area of 1,176 .5 m2 and a cross fall of about 7 m. In addition to its Walker Street frontage it has, at the rear, a 1.5 m wide access-way extending to Hartnett Street. Surrounding the site is a variety of built forms and land uses including: multi-storey residential flat and commercial buildings, and two and three-storey residential flat buildings.
Planning controls
4 Under the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001 the site is zoned Mixed Use and in this zone the proposed development is permissible with development consent. It is to be noted that cl 30 of the LEP does not have any application for the determination of this development application (see Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWCA 164). Under North Sydney Development Control Plan 2002 the site is included in the North Sydney Centre Planning Area.
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] NSWLEC 1168
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the respondent's contentions, which included the argument that the proposed building was excessive in height and scale, did not provide an adequate setback from Walker Street, and would have an unacceptable impact on heritage items and overshadow the Century Plaza building. The court also considered the draft North Sydney Local Environmental Plan - Amendment No 28, which proposed a maximum building height of RL 103 for the site. However, the court found that the draft LEP was invalid and of no effect, and therefore, could not be considered as a public interest factor.
In relation to the height and scale of the proposed building, the court found that while the building complied with the height control in the LEP, it did not meet the requirements of the North Sydney Development Control Plan, which provided for a stepping down in building heights towards the boundaries of the North Sydney Centre. The court concluded that the proposed building was too tall and would have an unacceptable visual dominance.
The court also found that the setbacks of the proposed building from Walker Street and its relationship with the podium were satisfactory. However, the court accepted that an increased setback at the north-east corner of the building, including the removal of the heavy frame around the balcony, would be beneficial.
Regarding the impact on heritage items, the court found that while the scale of the proposed building was significantly greater than that of the heritage items, there would be no adverse impact on the heritage items sufficient to warrant refusal of the application. The court took into account the various elements that contribute to the existing and future Walker Street streetscape, as well as the various planning controls that direct building height.
Finally, the court found that the overshadowing of the Century Plaza building would reduce the amenity of the affected Type D dwellings, in breach of the relevant planning controls. The court concluded that the proposed development, in its presently proposed form, should be refused.
The court dismissed the appeal, but the applicant was given the opportunity to consider its position before final orders were made. The court noted that a further lowering of the building could possibly be achieved by removing additional floors from the middle of the building, but a substantial reduction in height was not feasible in the context of this development application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.