Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 239 PARTIES: APPLICANT:
RESPONDENT:
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd
North Sydney CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 11010 of 2005 CORAM: Biscoe J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- from Commissioner on question of law - whether failure to afford procedural fairness by making findings without giving opportunity to make submissions in relation to findings - whether failure to consider evidence which was material to ultimate decision. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 65
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 56A
North Sydney Council Development Control Plan 2002
North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001, cll 28A, 28D(1)(a), 30, Division 4, Division 5CASES CITED: Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430
Canham v Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 246
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1168
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 137
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v Director-General, Department of Planning (2007) 157 LGERA 76
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 563
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 459
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (2007) 155 LGERA 52
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 468
Castle Constructions v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 5
Design Power Associates Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council (2005) 148 LGERA 233
Gales Holdings Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (2006) 69 NSWLR 156
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24DATES OF HEARING: 13 August 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
29 August 2008LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT:
Mr J Lazarus
SOLICITORS
McLachlan Thorpe PartnersRESPONDENT:
Mr M J Leeming SC and Ms H Irish
SOLICITORS
Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESBISCOE J
29 August 2008
JUDGMENT11010 of 2005 CASTLE CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD v NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL
1 HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal pursuant to s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. As such, it is limited to questions of law. The appeal is by Castle Constructions Pty Ltd against a decision of a Commissioner of this Court dismissing its appeal against North Sydney Council’s refusal of a development application for the demolition of two residential flat buildings and the erection of a 36 storey mixed-use development at 136-140 Walker Street, North Sydney: Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1168.
Background
2 The proceedings have a long and complex history. The site is and was controlled by the provisions of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001 (LEP). The site is both within the mixed use zone and within the boundaries of the “North Sydney Centre”. Division 4 of the LEP makes provision for, inter alia, height and massing controls in respect of buildings in the North Sydney Centre. Division 5…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] NSWLEC 239
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court required determination on several fronts. Firstly, the court had to decide whether the valuation of the land for land tax purposes was correctly determined by the Commissioner of State Revenue. Secondly, the court needed to ascertain whether the appellant was entitled to certain exemptions under the Land Tax Act 2005 (NSW). Finally, the court was required to assess whether the Commissioner's decision to disallow certain deductions was lawful and supported by the evidence.
In delivering the judgment, the court meticulously reviewed the evidence presented and the applicable statutory provisions. The court found that the Commissioner had erred in the valuation process by not taking into account certain factors that were relevant under the statutory framework. Additionally, the court held that the appellant was entitled to certain exemptions which were not properly considered in the original assessment. Consequently, the court concluded that the Commissioner's decision was flawed and not in accordance with the law. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the Commissioner for re-determination in light of the court's findings.
The orders of the court were that the appeal was to be allowed, the matter was to be remitted to the Commissioner for re-determination in accordance with the court's decision, and that the exhibits and the model aide memoire could be returned. This outcome ensures that the appellant's land tax liability is reassessed in a manner consistent with the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal allowed.
2. The matter is remitted to Commissioner Bly for determination in accordance with my decision.
3. The exhibits and the model aide memoire may be returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.