Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Case v Frimont [2021] NSWCA 30 Hearing dates: 2 March 2021 Decision date: 11 March 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1];
Gleeson JA at [2]:
Leeming JA at [3].Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal.
2. Appeal dismissed.
3. Mr Case to pay Ms Frimont’s costs of the appeal.
Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT - residential tenancy agreement - long term occupation of land in unadministered deceased estate - whether appellant entered into residential tenancy agreement with uncle who was in residence and entitled to 5/9 of estate - whether residential tenancy agreement can be with “estate” of deceased - whether appellant entered into residential tenancy agreement, 8 years later, with newly appointed administrator of deceased estate - no error in primary judge’s finding that no residential tenancy agreement entered into - appeal dismissed
Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 127
Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 61
Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 3, 7, 8, 13, 81, 119, Pt 5
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101
Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 50(a)
Cases Cited: Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon (2006) 225 CLR 364; [2006] HCA 32
Cohen-Hallaleh v Cyril Rosenbaum Synagogue [2003] NSWSC 395
Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22
Horton v Jones (1935) 53 CLR 475; [1935] HCA 7
Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129; [2019] HCA 28
Re Clover [1919] NZLR 103
Re Residential Tenancies Tribunal (NSW); Ex parte Defence Housing Authority (1997) 190 CLR 410; [1997] HCA 36
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Donald Bruce Case (Appellant)
Pamela Elizabeth Frimont (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
H Weller, solicitor (Appellant)
M Einfeld QC, D Currie (Respondent)
Herbert Weller (Appellant)
Paine Ross & Co (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/209108 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Common Law
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 03 July 2020
- Before:
- Davies J
- File Number(s):
- 2020/24814
Judgment
-
BASTEN JA: I agree with Leeming JA.
-
GLEESON JA: I agree with Leeming JA.
-
LEEMING JA: The appellant, Mr Donald Bruce Case, and the respondent, Ms Pamela Elizabeth Frimont, are nephew and aunt. In 2018, the latter became administrator of the intestate estate of the late Albert Bruce Case, who had died in 1968. He was her father, and the appellant’s grandfather. The estate remains unadministered. The only asset of the estate is a large parcel of Torrens title land at Blaxlands Ridge, part of which has been occupied by the appellant for more than a decade. The primary judge gave judgment for possession against the appellant and in favour of the respondent. Although long term occupation of land in an unadministered estate can give rise to a multiplicity of legal issues, those arising on this appeal are narrowly confined to whether the primary judge erred…
Continue reading Case v Frimont
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Case v Frimont [2021] NSWCA 30
- Case
- [2021] NSWCA 30
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether a residential tenancy agreement could be validly entered into with an "estate" itself, and whether the primary judge erred in finding that no such agreement existed between Mr Case and either his uncle or the subsequent administrator.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Basten, Gleeson and Leeming JJA, affirmed the primary judge's findings. The court reasoned that a residential tenancy agreement requires a landlord and a tenant, and that an estate, being an abstract concept, cannot be a landlord. Furthermore, the evidence did not support the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship with the uncle, nor was there sufficient evidence to establish a formal tenancy agreement with the administrator. The court found no error in the primary judge's factual conclusions.
Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed. Mr Case was ordered to pay Ms Frimont’s costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Grant leave to appeal.
2. Appeal dismissed.
3. Mr Case to pay Ms Frimont’s costs of the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.