Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd v Pichardo (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd v Pichardo (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 92
Hearing dates: 22 April 2024
Date of orders: 26 April 2024
Decision date: 26 April 2024
Before: Mitchelmore JA
Decision:

The notice of motion dated 2 April 2024 is dismissed with costs.

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — stay of orders — stay pending application for special leave to appeal to High Court — no exceptional circumstances — stay not granted

Legislation Cited:

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 30, 41

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 35A

Cases Cited:

123 259 932 Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 89

Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (2023) 111 NSWLR 304; [2023] NSWCA 88

Bingham v Bevan [2023] NSWCA 186

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 218; [2003] HCA 22

Jennings Construction Limited v Burgundy Royale Investments ProprietaryLimited (1986) 161 CLR 681; [1986] HCA 84

Rinehart v Welker (2012) 83 NSWLR 347; [2012] NSWCA 1

Robinson Helicopter Company Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; (2016) 331 ALR 550

Zhu v Wang [2021] NSWCA 265

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd (First Appellant/Respondent on motion)
Care A2 Australia Pty Ltd (Second Appellant/Respondent on motion)
Karla Patricia Pichardo (First Respondent/Applicant on motion)
Dylan Charles Azzopardi (Second Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Butt (Appellants)
A J McQuillen (First Respondent)

Solicitors:
Nelson McKinnon Lawyers (Appellants)
G.H. Healey & Co (First Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/57428
Publication restriction: N/A
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity – Corporations List
Citation:

[2023] NSWSC 11

Date of Decision:
23 January 2023
Before:
Black J
File Number(s):
2021/278723

JUDGMENT

  1. By notice of motion filed on 2 April 2024, the first respondent on the appeal, Karla Pichardo, applied to stay the orders that the Court of Appeal made on 22 February 2024, pending the outcome of an application for special leave to the High Court of Australia. The orders of the Court of Appeal were as follows:

“1. Appeal allowed in part with respect to the First Respondent, Karla Patricia Pichardo.

2. Set aside orders 9 and 10 entered 14 February 2023 so far as they refer to the First Respondent.

3. In lieu thereof, order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants amounts totalling $1,090,000 together with interest from the date of payments by the Appellants to DCA Sydney Enterprises Pty Ltd calculated in accordance with the rates provided under s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).

4. Order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants an amount of $30,000 by way of exemplary damages.

5. Order that the First Respondent be jointly liable with the Second Respondent in respect of the Appellants’ costs of the cross claim before the primary judge.

6. Order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants’ costs of the appeal.”

  1. Ms Pichardo made the application to this court in accordance…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd v Pichardo (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWCA 92
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd sought a stay of orders made by the Supreme Court of Queensland pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. The application was heard by Mitchelmore JA in the Court of Appeal.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to grant a stay of the Supreme Court's orders. This required the court to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of a stay in circumstances where an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court was contemplated.

Mitchelmore JA applied the established principles for granting a stay pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court. His Honour found that the applicant had not demonstrated the existence of exceptional circumstances that would warrant the grant of a stay. Consequently, the Court of Appeal determined that the application for a stay should be dismissed.

The notice of motion dated 2 April 2024 was dismissed, and Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

The notice of motion dated 2 April 2024 is dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.