| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMON LAW DIVISION
TRUSTS, EQUITY AND PROBATE LIST
S CI 2017 00286
| LEONIE CAPPELLERI & ORS (according to the attached Schedule) | Plaintiffs |
| v | |
| DOMENICO CAPPELLERI & ORS (according to the attached Schedule) | Defendants |
---
JUDGE: | McMillan J |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
DATE OF HEARING: | 29 July 2021 |
DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 30 August 2021 |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2) |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2021] VSC 535 |
---
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where one of two plaintiffs has lost capacity in long running family litigation – Where elderly plaintiff lost capacity in months before trial – Where defendants agree that elderly plaintiff has lost capacity – Where other plaintiff seeks appointment as litigation guardian of elderly plaintiff – Application opposed by defendants – Proceeding ready for trial – Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 ord 15.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiffs | Mr P Caillard Madgwicks Lawyers | |
| For the First, Second and Third Defendants | Mr G Nash QC | Access Law Lawyers |
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES
BETWEEN:
| LEONIE CAPPELLERI | First plaintiff |
| LEONIE CAPPELLERI (as executrix of the estate of FRANK CAPPELLERI, deceased) | Second plaintiff |
| VINCENZO NICOLA CAPPELLERI | Third plaintiff |
| - and - | |
| DOMENICO CAPPELLERI | First defendant |
| MARIO CAPPELLERI | Second defendant |
| F & L PTY LTD (ACN 006 187 873) | Third defendant |
| REGISTRAR OF TITLES | Fifth defendant |
| - and - | |
| DOMENICO CAPPELLERI | First plaintiff by counterclaim |
| MARIO CAPPELLERI | Second plaintiff by counterclaim |
| - and - | |
| LEONIE CAPPELLERI | First defendant by counterclaim |
| LEONIE CAPPELLERI (as executrix of the estate of FRANK CAPPELLERI, deceased) | Second defendant by counterclaim |
| VINCENZO NICOLA CAPPELLERI | Third defendant by counterclaim |
| REGISTRAR OF TITLES | Fifth defendant by counterclaim |
| F & L PTY LTD (ACN 006 187 873) | Sixth defendant by counterclaim |
HER HONOUR:
On 31 July 2017 Vincenzo Cappelleri (‘Vincenzo’) and his mother, Leonie Cappelleri (‘Leonie’), in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the executor of the estate of her late husband, Frank Cappelleri deceased (‘the deceased’s estate’), issued a proceeding against the deceased’s brothers, Domenico Cappelleri (‘Domenico’) and Mario Cappelleri (‘Mario’) and a family company, F & J Pty Ltd (‘F&L’).
A summary of the disputes as at 2020 is set out by Derham AsJ in Capelleri v Capelleri.[1] His Honour described the proceeding as concerning the ownership of a number of properties and control of F&L and how the ownership of these assets effects the deceased’s estate. Domenico and Mario assert that F&L was always controlled by the deceased and, after the deceased separated from Leonie, the deceased changed the shareholdings and directorship in F&L into the name of Domenico. They pleaded that Domenico holds the shares on trust for Mario and the estate of Anna Rosa Cappelleri.
[1]Cappelleri v Cappelleri [2020] VSC 306 (Derham AsJ).
Since then, Domenico and Mario filed a counterclaim on 19 June 2020 against Leonie, in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the executor of the deceased’s estate, Vincenzo, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] VSC 535
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether Vincenzo Cappelleri should be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, and whether the title of the proceeding should be amended to reflect this change. The defendants argued against the appointment, stating that the proceeding was ready for trial, but the court had to consider the necessity of a litigation guardian in the circumstances. The court had to weigh the urgency of the proceeding against the need to ensure that Leonie's interests were adequately represented.
The court decided that Vincenzo Cappelleri should be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, as it was necessary to ensure that her interests were properly represented in the litigation. The court also ordered that the title of the proceeding be amended to reflect this change. The court found that the defendants' opposition to the appointment was not sufficient to outweigh the need for a litigation guardian, and that the proceeding was not so advanced that the appointment would cause significant delay. The court reserved costs for further consideration.
In summary, the court ordered that Vincenzo Cappelleri be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, and that the title of the proceeding be amended accordingly. Costs were reserved for further consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders
The Court will order that:
(a) pursuant to r 15.03(4)(a) of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015, Vincenzo Cappelleri be appointed litigation guardian of Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity and the title to the proceeding be amended accordingly;
(b) Costs reserved.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.