Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

COMMON LAW DIVISION

TRUSTS, EQUITY AND PROBATE LIST

S CI 2017 00286

LEONIE CAPPELLERI & ORS (according to the attached Schedule) Plaintiffs
v 
DOMENICO CAPPELLERI & ORS (according to the attached Schedule) Defendants

---

JUDGE:

McMillan J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

29 July 2021

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

30 August 2021

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2)

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2021] VSC 535

---

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where one of two plaintiffs has lost capacity in long running family litigation – Where elderly plaintiff lost capacity in months before trial – Where defendants agree that elderly plaintiff has lost capacity – Where other plaintiff seeks appointment as litigation guardian of elderly plaintiff – Application opposed by defendants – Proceeding ready for trial – Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 ord 15.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Plaintiffs Mr P Caillard
Madgwicks Lawyers
For the First, Second and Third Defendants Mr G Nash QC Access Law Lawyers

SCHEDULE OF PARTIES

BETWEEN:

LEONIE CAPPELLERI First plaintiff
LEONIE CAPPELLERI (as executrix of the estate of FRANK CAPPELLERI, deceased) Second plaintiff
VINCENZO NICOLA CAPPELLERI Third plaintiff
- and -
DOMENICO CAPPELLERI First defendant
MARIO CAPPELLERI Second defendant
F & L PTY LTD (ACN 006 187 873) Third defendant
REGISTRAR OF TITLES Fifth defendant
- and -
DOMENICO CAPPELLERI First plaintiff by counterclaim
MARIO CAPPELLERI Second plaintiff by counterclaim
- and -
LEONIE CAPPELLERI First defendant by counterclaim
LEONIE CAPPELLERI (as executrix of the estate of FRANK CAPPELLERI, deceased) Second defendant by counterclaim
VINCENZO NICOLA CAPPELLERI Third defendant by counterclaim
REGISTRAR OF TITLES Fifth defendant by counterclaim
F & L PTY LTD (ACN 006 187 873) Sixth defendant by counterclaim

HER HONOUR:

  1. On 31 July 2017 Vincenzo Cappelleri (‘Vincenzo’) and his mother, Leonie Cappelleri (‘Leonie’), in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the executor of the estate of her late husband, Frank Cappelleri deceased (‘the deceased’s estate’), issued a proceeding against the deceased’s brothers, Domenico Cappelleri (‘Domenico’) and Mario Cappelleri (‘Mario’) and a family company, F & J Pty Ltd (‘F&L’).

  1. A summary of the disputes as at 2020 is set out by Derham AsJ in Capelleri v Capelleri.[1] His Honour described the proceeding as concerning the ownership of a number of properties and control of F&L and how the ownership of these assets effects the deceased’s estate.  Domenico and Mario assert that F&L was always controlled by the deceased and, after the deceased separated from Leonie, the deceased changed the shareholdings and directorship in F&L into the name of Domenico.  They pleaded that Domenico holds the shares on trust for Mario and the estate of Anna Rosa Cappelleri.

  1. Since then, Domenico and Mario filed a counterclaim on 19 June 2020 against Leonie, in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the executor of the deceased’s estate, Vincenzo, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] VSC 535
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in Cappelleri v Cappelleri (No 2) involved ongoing family litigation, with one of the two plaintiffs, Leonie Cappelleri, having lost capacity shortly before the trial. The defendants acknowledged that Leonie had lost capacity, while the other plaintiff, Vincenzo Cappelleri, sought to be appointed as Leonie's litigation guardian. The defendants opposed this application, arguing that the proceeding was ready for trial. The case was heard in the Supreme Court, where the court had to decide on the appointment of a litigation guardian for Leonie and the amendment of the proceeding's title accordingly.

The legal issue before the court was whether Vincenzo Cappelleri should be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, and whether the title of the proceeding should be amended to reflect this change. The defendants argued against the appointment, stating that the proceeding was ready for trial, but the court had to consider the necessity of a litigation guardian in the circumstances. The court had to weigh the urgency of the proceeding against the need to ensure that Leonie's interests were adequately represented.

The court decided that Vincenzo Cappelleri should be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, as it was necessary to ensure that her interests were properly represented in the litigation. The court also ordered that the title of the proceeding be amended to reflect this change. The court found that the defendants' opposition to the appointment was not sufficient to outweigh the need for a litigation guardian, and that the proceeding was not so advanced that the appointment would cause significant delay. The court reserved costs for further consideration.

In summary, the court ordered that Vincenzo Cappelleri be appointed as a litigation guardian for Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity, and that the title of the proceeding be amended accordingly. Costs were reserved for further consideration.

Orders

Orders of the court

Orders

The Court will order that:

(a) pursuant to r 15.03(4)(a) of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015, Vincenzo Cappelleri be appointed litigation guardian of Leonie Cappelleri in her personal capacity and the title to the proceeding be amended accordingly;

(b) Costs reserved.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.