Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Butt v The Owners – Strata Plan No 71715 [2023] NSWCATCD 60 Hearing dates: 16 May 2023, on the papers Date of orders: 06 June 2023 Decision date: 06 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member Decision: 1. The summons to the first respondent issued by the Tribunal on 6 April 2023 at the request of the applicant is set aside.
2. The summons to the second respondent issued by the Tribunal on 6 April 2023 at the request of the applicant is set aside.
3. Costs are reserved.
4. If either respondent seek costs, they should file and serve submissions as to costs within 14 days. Their submissions should identify the relevant costs rule and the reasons why costs should ordered.
5. The applicant may respond within a further 14 days
6. The respondents may reply within a further 7days.
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside a summons to produce documents
Cases Cited: Structerre Consulting Engineers (NSW) Pty Limited v Townend [2020] NSWSC 1476
Wollongong Coal Ltd v Gujarat NRE Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 758
Texts Cited: The Hon J Bryson KC, Continuing Professional Education - The 2004 Judges Series. Practical Litigation in the Supreme Court and the Federal Court.
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Paul Thomas Butt (Applicant)
The Owners – Strata Plan No 71715 (First Respondent)
John O’Donnell (Second Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Applicant:
First Respondent: Swaab
Second Respondent: SpeirsRyan
File Number(s): SC 23/03267 Publication restriction: NIL
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
This is an application by the respondents to set aside summonses issued on 6 April 2023 at the request of the applicant (Mr Butt) to:
the first respondent (OC) (OC Summons); and
to the second respondent (Mr O’Donnell) (O’Donnell Summons).
-
The content of the Schedule of the OC Summons is as follows:
1. Comittee [sic] and general meeting minutes concerning complaint of noise by or on behalf of the owners of Lot 26 within lot 26 and complaints/investigations relating to the applicant's lot 50 and the applicants use of that lot being the source and/or cause of such noise. (lot 26 noise issue)
2.Documents evidencing communication between the respondents and or their respective agents about the lot 26 noise issue.
3.Documents evidencing or recording noise complaints from other lot owners or occupiers in the respondent scheme building from 1 January 2020 to the date of service of this summons.
4. Documents evidencing correspondence between the respondents and their respective agents and Ausgrid about noise complaints other than the lot 26 noise issue in the strata scheme building.
5. Documents evidencing correspondence between the respondents and their respective agents and any third party other than Ausgrid/Acoustic Logic about the lot 26 noise issue and other noise complaints in the strata scheme building.
5.Documents evidencing the first respondent's brief to Acoustic Logic to report…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Butt v The Owners Strata Plan No 71715 and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NSWCATCD 60
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the summonses were appropriate and necessary for the resolution of the underlying strata title matter. The applicant argued that the summonses were overly broad and potentially oppressive, seeking documents that were not relevant to the matters at hand. The respondents, on the other hand, contended that the documents were necessary to fully understand the issues and to prepare their defence.
The court considered the arguments and found that the summonses were indeed too broad and potentially oppressive. The court noted that the summonses sought a wide range of documents without clear relevance to the specific issues in the strata title matter. The court held that the summonses were not necessary for the resolution of the underlying dispute and were therefore set aside. The court reserved costs and outlined a process for either party to seek costs if they so wished. The applicant was given a period to respond, and the respondents a shorter period to reply.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The summons to the first respondent issued by the Tribunal on 6 April 2023 at the request of the applicant is set aside.
2. The summons to the second respondent issued by the Tribunal on 6 April 2023 at the request of the applicant is set aside.
3. Costs are reserved.
4. If either respondent seek costs, they should file and serve submissions as to costs within 14 days. Their submissions should identify the relevant costs rule and the reasons why costs should ordered.
5. The applicant may respond within a further 14 days
6. The respondents may reply within a further 7days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.