District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Butt v Liebherr Australia Pty Limited [2015] NSWDC 3 Hearing dates: 19 August 2014 Decision date: 02 February 2015 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Award for:
(a) $5,715.40 for 10.8% impairment of plaintiff’s neck;
(b) $7,408.80 for 7% loss of efficient use of plaintiff’s right arm at or above the elbow;
(c) $7938.00 for 10% impairment of plaintiff’s back;
(d) $11,907.00 under s 67 for pain and suffering resulting from those impairments and that loss.Catchwords: WORKERS COMPENSATION – Coal miners – Whether plaintiff a coal miner for the purposes of Sch 6, Pt 18 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 – Whether plaintiff was a worker employed in or about a coal mine Legislation Cited: Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982
Evidence Act 1995
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Workers Compensation Act 1926
Workers Compensation Act 1987
Workers Compensation (General) Regulation 1995
Workers Compensation Regulation 2003
Workers Compensation Regulation 2010Cases Cited: Badior v Muswellbrook Crane Service Pty Ltd (2004) 2 DDCR 177
Baggs v Waratah Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] HCA Trans 108
Brown v Barnard and Brown Pty Ltd (1998) 17 NSWCCR 275
Benson v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Coy [1904] 1 AC 242
Ellavale Engineering Pty Ltd v Pilgrim [2005] NSWCA 272; (2005) 2 DDCR 744
Fekonja v Lucsan Pty Ltd (1994) 10 NSWCCR 339
Fenton v ATF Mining Electrics Pty Ltd (2004) 1 DDCR 744
Maurino v Amberlor Pty Ltd (1996) 14 NSWCCR 16
Nolan v Porter and Sons (1910) 2 BWCC 106 (Eng. CA).
Pilgrim v Ellavale Engineering Pty Ltd (2003) 25 NSWCCR 521
Presland v Ellavale Engineering Pty Ltd (2005) 3 DDCR 179
Roberts v Fuchs Lubricants (Australasia) Pty Ltd (2002) 24 NSWCCR 125
Select Civil (Kiama) Pty Ltd v Kearney [2012] NSWCA 320
Smith v Brown (1998) 16 NSWCCR 492
Weaver v Tredegar Iron and Coal Coy Ltd [1940] AC 955
Waratah Engineering Pty Ltd v Baggs [2013] NSWCA 427Texts Cited: C P Mills, Workers Compensation New South Wales (2nd ed 1979, Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stanley George Butt (Plaintiff)
Liebherr Australia Pty Limited (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr D Benson (Plaintiff)
Mr M Newton (Defendant)
Slater & Gordon (Plaintiff)
HWL Ebsworth (Defendant)
File Number(s): RJ261/13
Judgment
Cur Adv Vult
-
By an amended statement of claim filed in court on 19 August 2014, the plaintiff claims:
(a) lump sum compensation under the Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 66, for:
(i) $6,350.40 for 12% impairment of his neck,
(ii) $10,584.00 for 10% permanent loss of efficient use of his right arm at or above the elbow, and
(iii) $7,938.00 for 10% permanent impairment of his back, and
(b) a lump sum under s 67 of that Act of $19,860.
The plaintiff relies on an injury which he received on 12 October 2010 on a journey to work on that day at the Mt Arthur open-cut coal mine near Muswellbrook. I would normally not reserve a judgment of this nature but I was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Butt v Liebherr Australia Pty Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] NSWDC 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the definition of a coal miner under the Act and the specific circumstances of Mr. Butt’s employment. It found that Mr. Butt's role involved activities integral to coal mining operations, thus satisfying the criteria for being a coal miner. The court further concluded that his employment was sufficiently connected to a coal mine, qualifying him for the benefits outlined in the Act. The assessment of compensation was based on the percentage of impairment and loss of use of specific body parts, as well as the statutory provision for pain and suffering. The court meticulously reviewed medical evidence and the relevant statutory provisions to determine the appropriate compensation amounts.
As a result, the court awarded Mr. Butt compensation for the injuries sustained, comprising $5,715.40 for 10.8% impairment of his neck, $7,408.80 for 7% loss of efficient use of his right arm at or above the elbow, $7,938.00 for 10% impairment of his back, and $11,907.00 for pain and suffering. The court ruled in favor of Mr. Butt, ensuring he received the compensation for his injuries under the Workers Compensation Act 1987.
Orders
Orders of the court
Award for:
(a) $5,715.40 for 10.8% impairment of plaintiff’s neck;
(b) $7,408.80 for 7% loss of efficient use of plaintiff’s right arm at or above the elbow;
(c) $7938.00 for 10% impairment of plaintiff’s back;
(d) $11,907.00 under s 67 for pain and suffering resulting from those impairments and that loss.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.