DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Burns v Boeve [2011] QDC 20
PARTIES:
DARREN MARK BURNS
Applicantv
LUKE EDWARD BOEVE
RespondentFILE NO/S:
39/2010
DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Application for criminal compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:
Beenleigh
DELIVERED ON:
4 March, 2011
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
23 December 2010
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
The respondent Luke Edward Boeve pay the applicant Darren Mark Burns the sum of $21,750.
CATCHWORDS:
APPLICATION – CRIMINAL COMPENSATION – grievous bodily harm – bruising/laceration – loss or damage of teeth – severe facial fracture
LEGISLATION:
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 s. 24
Victims of Crime Assistance Act 2009 ss. 154 and 155
CASES:
COUNSEL:
C Williams (solicitor) for the applicant
No appearance for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Muir Lawyers for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Introduction
The respondent, Luke Edward Boeve, pleaded guilty in the Beenleigh District Court on 22 September 2009 to one count of grievous bodily harm in respect of the applicant Darren Mark Burns. The respondent was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, with an immediate parole release date on the date of sentence (22 September 2009).[1]
[1] Exhibit EAM1 (Sentencing remarks) pp 1-7, 1-9, affidavit of Eric Muir sworn 20 January 2010
Facts
The respondent attended at a pre-Christmas party on the evening of 23 December 2007. There were a number of uninvited guests at the party, although the respondent was an invited guest. The applicant was assisting the party organisers, and asked the respondent to leave. It was, at this stage, somewhere between 1.20 and 2 am on 24 December 2007. The respondent had consumed a significant amount of alcohol and was quite drunk. When asked to leave, the respondent punched the applicant with a closed fist to the left side of his face.[2]
[2] Exhibit EAM1 pp 1-2 – 1-3, affidavit of Eric Muir sworn 20 January 2010
Injuries
The applicant suffered the following injuries:-
(1) Bruising, swelling and numbness left mid face;
(2) Fractured left zygoma (cheekbone) with displacement;
(3) Minor minimal displaced fracture left orbital floor[3].
The applicant also had two front lower teeth broken as a result of the offence[4].
[3] Exhibit DB 3 (Schedule of Facts) Affidavit of Darren Burns sworn 1 July 2010
[4] Exhibit EAM1, p.1-4 Affidavit of Eric Muir sworn 20 January 2010
The applicant required surgery, involving a dual opening operation approached both intra-orally (inside the mouth) and externally through the scalp in the temporal (pre-auricular) regions. Following reduction and re-alignment of the multifocal fractures, the zygoma was fixed with two titanium mini-bone plates. The large intraorbital sensory nerve branch in the left mid face was decompressed by the fracture re-alignments and demonstrated early significant recovery of functions, with feeling returning to the left midface over the period of post-surgical review as an outpatient while the applicant remained in Brisbane over a period of two weeks.[5]
[5] Exhibit DB3 (Schedule of facts) p.2 affidavit of Darren Burns sworn 1…
Continue reading Burns v Boeve
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Burns v Boeve [2011] QDC 20
- Case
- [2011] QDC 20
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide included whether the injuries sustained by the applicant, which involved bruising, lacerations, loss or damage of teeth, and a severe facial fracture, amounted to grievous bodily harm. The court also needed to consider the severity of these injuries and the resultant impact on the applicant's life. Furthermore, the court had to assess the evidence presented regarding the impact of the injuries on the applicant's physical and psychological well-being, as well as the necessity for ongoing medical treatment.
The court found that the injuries sustained by the applicant did indeed constitute grievous bodily harm. The severity of the bruising, lacerations, and facial fracture, along with the loss or damage of teeth, warranted a significant award of compensation. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and concluded that the injuries had a substantial impact on the applicant's life, necessitating a comprehensive compensation package. As a result, the court ordered the respondent to pay the applicant the sum of $21,750 to cover the costs associated with the injuries and their consequences.
Orders
Orders of the court
The respondent Luke Edward Boeve pay the applicant Darren Mark Burns the sum of $21,750.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.