Budd v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs

Case

[2009] FCA 1138

6 OCTOBER 2009


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Budd v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2009] FCA 1138 [2009] FCA 1138 6 OCTOBER 2009

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were Budd, the applicant, and the Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, the respondent. The nature of the dispute was the applicant's request for an extension of time to appeal a decision and judgment delivered by Emmett J on 26 August 2009. The application was made by the applicant in her Notice of Motion filed on 21 September 2009.

The legal issues the court was required to decide were whether the applicant's application for an extension of time to appeal should be granted and whether the applicant should be ordered to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. The court considered the relevant statutory provisions and case law on the issue of extensions of time for appeals. The court also took into account the applicant's reasons for seeking an extension of time and the respondent's opposition to the application.

The court's reasoning and outcome were that the application for an extension of time to appeal should be dismissed. The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to justify an extension of time and that the application was made without any reasonable prospect of success. The court also found that the applicant should be ordered to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. The court assessed the costs at $500.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the applicant's application for an extension of time to appeal and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. The court's decision was based on the applicant's lack of evidence to justify an extension of time and the absence of any reasonable prospect of success. The court's order highlights the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support an application for an extension of time and the consequences of making an application without any reasonable prospect of success.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Limitation Periods

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

8

Attorney General v Budd [2013] NSWSC 155
Gill v iiNet Limited [2016] FCA 1273
Cases Cited

9

Statutory Material Cited

0

Donnelly v Maxwell-Smith [2010] FCAFC 154