Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks
Case
•
[2015] FCA 756
•24 July 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2015] FCA 756
[2015] FCA 756
24 July 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks, the applicant sought to register the term "SIR WALTER" as a trade mark for certain goods, including a variety of buffalo grass. The application was initially refused by a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks on the basis that the term "SIR WALTER" was not inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from those of other traders and had not distinguished the goods prior to the filing date of the application. The applicant appealed this decision.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the term "SIR WALTER" was inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods, specifically a variety of buffalo grass, and whether it had been used to distinguish the goods before the filing date of the application. The court had to consider the relevant statutory provisions and case law in determining whether the term was distinctive enough to be registered as a trade mark.
The court found that the term "SIR WALTER" was not inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from those of other traders, as it was the given and official name of the plant variety. The court also found that the term had not been used to distinguish the goods prior to the filing date of the application. The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the delegate's decision, ordering that the application not proceed to acceptance unless it was amended by deleting the specification of goods in Class 31. The applicant was required to make any request in writing to the Registrar of Trade Marks for an amendment by a specified date, and was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the term "SIR WALTER" was inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods, specifically a variety of buffalo grass, and whether it had been used to distinguish the goods before the filing date of the application. The court had to consider the relevant statutory provisions and case law in determining whether the term was distinctive enough to be registered as a trade mark.
The court found that the term "SIR WALTER" was not inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from those of other traders, as it was the given and official name of the plant variety. The court also found that the term had not been used to distinguish the goods prior to the filing date of the application. The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the delegate's decision, ordering that the application not proceed to acceptance unless it was amended by deleting the specification of goods in Class 31. The applicant was required to make any request in writing to the Registrar of Trade Marks for an amendment by a specified date, and was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Trade Mark Registration
-
Distinctiveness
-
Descriptiveness
-
Inherent Adaptation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Franchise Legal Pty Limited [2025] ATMO 137
Cases Citing This Decision
56
Franchise Legal Pty Limited
[2025] ATMO 137
Franchise Legal Pty Limited
[2025] ATMO 137
Mobile Skips (Australia) Pty Ltd
[2024] ATMO 180
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
3
Apple Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks
[2014] FCA 1304
Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks
[1964] HCA 55
Cantarella Bros Pty Limited v Modena Trading Pty Limited
[2014] HCA 48