BROWNLESS & WARREN

Case [2018] FamCA 101


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BROWNLESS & WARREN [2018] FamCA 101
FAMILY LAW – DE FACTO RELATIONSHIP – indicia of relationship – whether de facto relationship existed – when de facto relationship existed – declaration of de facto relationship.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4AA, 90RD, 90RG, 90SM
Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008 (Cth)

Cadman & Hallett [2013] Fam CA 819
Jonah v White (2012) 48 Fam LR 562
Hibberson v George (1989) 12 Fam LR 725
S v B (No 2) (2004) 32 Fam LR 429

APPLICANT: Mr Brownless
RESPONDENT: Ms Warren
FILE NUMBER: SYC 5430 of 2015
DATE DELIVERED: 27 February 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Gill J
HEARING DATE: 19-22 February 2018

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Levet
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Kinghan & Associates
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Campton, SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Blackman Legal Pty Ltd

Orders

  1. The initiating application filed by Mr Brownless on 18 August 2015 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

  2. The order of Watts J made 27 March 2017 in relation to the Suburb B property is discharged, and the application in a case filed by Mr Brownless on 12 December 2016 is dismissed.

  3. The application in a case filed by Mr Brownless on 12 July 2017 is dismissed. 

  4. In the event that a party seeks costs in this matter, that party is to file and serve within 14 days:

    (a)       A minute of the order sought;

    (b)       Any further evidential material to be relied upon, including a financial statement

  5. In the event that such costs are resisted, that party is to file and serve any material relied upon including a financial statement within a further 14 days.

  6. On the filing of the material in Order 4 a further date will be allocated for the determination of costs.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Brownless & Warren has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC 5430 of 2015

Mr Brownless

Applicant

And

Ms Warren

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. An initiating application was filed by Mr Brownless on 18 August 2015 seeking declarations pursuant to s 90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 that a de facto relationship existed between himself and the respondent, Ms Warren, and further, a declaration that the relationship existed from approximately late 1992 until mid-December 2014.  While he also sought orders pursuant to s 90SM of the Act to alter…

Continue reading BROWNLESS & WARREN

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
BROWNLESS & WARREN [2018] FamCA 101
Case
[2018] FamCA 101
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Brownless & Warren*, the applicant, Mr Brownless, sought various orders from the court. The respondent, Ms Warren, contested the jurisdiction of the court to hear the applications. The case was heard by Gill J.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether it possessed the jurisdiction to entertain the applications filed by Mr Brownless. This encompassed the determination of the validity and enforceability of previous orders made by Watts J, and the court's power to make further orders in relation to the property at Suburb B.

Gill J found that the initiating application filed by Mr Brownless lacked the necessary jurisdictional basis. Consequently, the court discharged the order of Watts J concerning the Suburb B property and dismissed Mr Brownless's applications filed on 12 December 2016 and 12 July 2017 for want of jurisdiction. The court also made provision for the parties to seek costs, requiring detailed submissions and evidential material, including financial statements, to be filed within specified timeframes.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The initiating application filed by Mr Brownless on 18 August 2015 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

2.

The order of Watts J made 27 March 2017 in relation to the Suburb B property is discharged, and the application in a case filed by Mr Brownless on 12 December 2016 is dismissed.

3.

The application in a case filed by Mr Brownless on 12 July 2017 is dismissed.

4.

In the event that a party seeks costs in this matter, that party is to file and serve within 14 days:

(a) A minute of the order sought;

(b) Any further evidential material to be relied upon, including a financial statement

5.

In the event that such costs are resisted, that party is to file and serve any material relied upon including a financial statement within a further 14 days.

6.

On the filing of the material in Order 4 a further date will be allocated for the determination of costs.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.