Brown & Anor v Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd

Case [2012] QCATA 194


CITATION: Brown and Anor v Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 194
PARTIES: Deborah Brown
Christopher Brown
(Appellants)
v
Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: APL035–12
MATTER TYPE: Appeals
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Justice Alan Wilson, President
Aaron Suthers, Member
DELIVERED ON: 9 October 2012

DELIVERED AT:

ORDERS MADE:

Brisbane

1.    The appeal is allowed, but only to the following extent:

a.    The Order of the Tribunal dated 3 February 2012 numbered 1 is amended by reducing the amount to be distributed to Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd by the sum of $957.00, and increasing the amount to be distributed to Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown by the sum of $957.00;

b.    In the event that the funds referred to in that Order have been distributed to the parties by the Queensland Master Builders Association, then Noosa Constructions shall pay to Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown the sum of $957.00 within 21 days of this Order.

2.    The application by Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown for their costs of the Appeal is dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – PERFORMANCE OF WORK – where Appellant brought a claim for rectification and determination of variations – where Tribunal ordered rectification and determined the parties’ rights to a retention in the Queensland Master Builders Association trust account – where Tribunal failed to expose a basis for the decision – where most matters determined on appeal – whether remaining alleged errors of fact substantial – whether rehearing warranted

Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000, s 79, 84
Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991, s 77
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, ss, 4, 28, 91, 43, 121, 142

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2009, r 85

Adamson v Queensland Law Society Incorporated [1990] 1 Qd R 498, cited

Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155, cited
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175, cited

Attorney-General v Kehoe [2000] QCA 222, cited

Black, G v Toowoomba Resort Pty Ltd [2007] QCCTB 122, cited
Cachia v Grech [2009] NSWCA 232, cited
Chapman & Ors V Allan & Draper[1999] SASC 460, cited
Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22
Glenwood Properties Pty Ltd v Delmoss Pty Ltd [1986] 2 Qd R 388, cited
Hawkins v Pender Bros Pty Ltd [1990] 1 Qd R 135, cited

Jimenez v Sternlight Investments t/a LJ Hooker Alexandra Hills [2010] QCATA 29, cited

Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298, cited

Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534, cited

Lida Build Pty Ltd v Miller and Anor [2011] QCATA 219, cited
Lyons v Dreamstarter Pty Ltd [2011] QCATA 142, cited

McIver Bulk Liquid Haulage Pty Ltd v Fruehauf Australia Pty Ltd [1989] 2 Qd R 577, cited

Shillingsworth v Murray (2005) 2 DDCR 450; [2004] NSWCA 465, cited

Thomas v State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 22,…

Continue reading Brown & Anor v Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Brown & Anor v Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 194
Case
[2012] QCATA 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Brown & Anor v Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd was an appeal from a decision made by a tribunal regarding a dispute in a building contract. The appellants, Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown, sought rectification and a determination of variations in the contract. They argued that the respondent, Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd, had failed to complete the work as per the contract terms. The tribunal ordered rectification and determined the parties' rights to a retention in the Queensland Master Builders Association trust account. The appellants challenged the tribunal's decision, arguing that it was not adequately reasoned.

The key legal issues were whether the tribunal had failed to provide a reasoned basis for its decision, and if so, whether this warranted a rehearing. Additionally, the court had to determine if the remaining alleged errors of fact were substantial enough to warrant a rehearing. The court assessed the extent to which the tribunal's decision was based on factual errors and whether those errors had a significant impact on the outcome.

The court found that the tribunal had indeed failed to adequately expose the basis for its decision, leading to an insufficiently reasoned judgment. However, the court held that the alleged factual errors were not substantial enough to warrant a rehearing. Instead, the court determined that the appeal should be allowed to a limited extent to correct a clerical error in the tribunal's order. The tribunal's order was amended to reflect the correct distribution of funds. The court also dismissed the appellants' application for their costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Brisbane

1. The appeal is allowed, but only to the following extent:

a. The Order of the Tribunal dated 3 February 2012 numbered 1 is amended by reducing the amount to be distributed to Noosa Constructions Pty Ltd by the sum of $957.00, and increasing the amount to be distributed to Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown by the sum of $957.00;

b. In the event that the funds referred to in that Order have been distributed to the parties by the Queensland Master Builders Association, then Noosa Constructions shall pay to Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown the sum of $957.00 within 21 days of this Order.

2. The application by Deborah Brown and Christopher Brown for their costs of the Appeal is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.