Brogan v Territory Insurance Office Board [2009] NTSC 16
PARTIES: DOLORES JANE BROGAN,
LUCY GERARDINE CAMPBELL-
BROGAN,
KATE CAMPBELL-BROGAN,
EMMA CAMPBELL-BROGAN,
SAMARA BLURTON,
SIMONE BROGAN AND
JESSICA ANN BROGANv TERRITORY INSURANCE OFFICE
BOARDTITLE OF COURT: SUPREME COURT OF THE
NORTHERN TERRITORYJURISDICTION: SUPREME COURT OF THE
NORTHERN TERRITORY
EXERCISING TERRITORY
JURISDICTIONFILE NO: M2 of 2006 (20622738) DELIVERED: 22 April 2009 HEARING DATES: 28 and 29 July 2008 JUDGMENT OF: SOUTHWOOD J CATCHWORDS: MOTOR ACCIDENTS – COMPENSATION – Reference under s 29(1) of Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act (NT) – injuries not the result of an accident as defined by s 4 of the Act – internal physiological process is not
an occurrence on a public street – reference is dismissed – no benefits
payable to the applicants under the Act – s 22 and s 23 of the Act not
satisfied
Augusto v Board of Territory Insurance Office (1990) 66 NTR 1; The
Commonwealth v Hornsby (1960) 103 CLR 588; Government Insurance
Office of New South Wales v King (1960) 104 CLR 93; Kelly v R (2004) 205
ALR 274; Project Blue Sky v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355; Refrigerated
Express Lines (A/Asia) Pty Ltd v Australian Meat and Live-Stock
Corporation (No 2) (1980) 29 ALR 333, applied
Government Insurance Office (NSW) v R W Green & Lloyd Pty Ltd (1965)114 CLR 437; considered
Dickinson v Motor Vehicle Insurance Trust (1987) 163 CLR 500; Fawcett v
B.H.P. By-Products Pty Ltd (1960) 104 CLR 80; Shannon v Territory
Insurance Office (1993) 3 NTLR 144; State Government InsuranceCommission v Stevens Bros. Pty Ltd (1984) 154 CLR 552, referred to
REPRESENTATION:
Counsel:
Appellant: R Wild QC Respondent: M C Livesey QC Solicitors:
Appellant: Ward Keller Respondent: CridlandsMB Judgment category classification: B
Judgment ID Number: Sou0904 Number of pages: 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY
OF AUSTRALIA
AT DARWINBrogan v Territory Insurance Office Board [2009] NTSC 16
No M2 of 2006 (20622738)
BETWEEN:
DOLORES JANE BROGAN,
LUCY-GERARDINE CAMPBELL-
BROGAN,
KATE CAMPBELL-BROGAN,
EMMA CAMPBELL-BROGAN,
SAMARA-LEE BLURTON,
SIMONE BROGAN ANDJESSICA ANN BROGAN
Applicants
AND:
TERRITORY INSURANCE OFFICE
BOARD
Respondent
CORAM: SOUTHWOOD J REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered 22 April 2009)
Introduction
This is a reference under s 29(1) of the Motor Accidents (Compensation)
Act (the Act[1]). The applicants are aggrieved by a determination of the
Board of the Territory Insurance Office[2] to uphold the designated person’sdecision to reject their application for benefits under Part V[3] of the Act.
The applicants are the surviving spouse of Martin James Campbell, who is
deceased, and her six children. Mr Campbell died of heart failure on Blue
Water Road, Melville Island on 30 October 2005. Before he died
Mr Campbell kick-started his motorcycle on Blue Water Road and then rode
the motorcycle on the road. After Mr Campbell died the applicants applied
for lump-sum compensation in respect of his death and for dependent
children’s benefits under s 22 and s 23 of the…
Continue reading Brogan v Territory Insurance Office Board
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Brogan v Territory Insurance Office Board [2009] NTSC 16
- Case
- [2009] NTSC 16
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In reaching its decision, the court examined the evidence presented, including the medical reports and testimonies of Ms Brogan and Professor Pitt. Ms Brogan described Mr Campbell’s activities leading up to his death and his complaints of feeling unwell. Professor Pitt provided expert medical opinion on the nature of Mr Campbell's death, noting that it was sudden and not preceded by a myocardial infarction. The court concluded that the statutory requirements were not met as Mr Campbell's death was not caused by an accident and did not occur on a public street. The court also considered the specific routes and locations relevant to the case but found that the death did not result from an event on a public road. The reasoning of the court was grounded in the statutory language and the specific facts of Mr Campbell's death, leading to the conclusion that the claim for benefits should be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.