Legal Research
Cases
Brimelow v Alampi

Brimelow v Alampi

Case [2016] VSC 135 8 April 2016

Moral Duty

Quantum in Dispute

Succession Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA

Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

COMMON LAW DIVISION
TESTATORS FAMILY MAINTENANCE LIST

S CI 2015 02329

TESSA BRIMELOW	Plaintiff
v
SALVATORE ALAMPI	Defendant

---

JUDGE:	McMillan J
WHERE HELD:	Melbourne
DATE OF HEARING:	14 December 2015
DATE OF JUDGMENT:	8 April 2016
CASE MAY BE CITED AS:	Brimelow v Alampi
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:	[2016] VSC 135

---

SUCCESSION LAW — Where deceased made no provision for adult daughter — Where moral duty to the applicant conceded — Where quantum in dispute — Justice Legislation Amendment (Succession and Surrogacy) Act 2014 — Administration and Probate Act 1958, Part IV.

---

APPEARANCES:	Counsel	Solicitors
For the Plaintiff	Mr J D Catlin	Marshalls + Dent Lawyers
For the Defendant	Ms C Sparke QC	Hentys Lawyers

HER HONOUR:

Introduction

Rita Alampi (‘the deceased’) died on 10 January 2015, aged 69 years. Her husband, Francesco Alampi, pre-deceased her. The deceased was survived by her three adult children:

(a) Teresa Brimelow (‘the plaintiff’) born on 6 May 1965;

(b) Salvatore Alampi (‘the defendant’) born on 12 September 1972; and

(c) Vincenzo Alampi born on 16 December 1978.

By her will dated 4 August 2014 (‘the will’), the deceased appointed the defendant as the executor of her will and trustee of her estate. The deceased left her estate to the defendant, with no provision made at all for the plaintiff or Vincenzo Alampi. The deceased’s reasons given in her will for failing to provide for two of her children was set out in clause 4 of her will as follows: ‘I direct that I have not made any bequests to my children [the plaintiff] and Vincenzo Alampi as I have no meaningful relationship with them’.

Probate of the deceased’s will was granted to the defendant on 2 April 2015.

At the final directions for the trial of this proceeding, the defendant conceded that, at the time of her death, the deceased had a moral duty to provide for the plaintiff’s proper maintenance and support and that the deceased failed to make adequate provision for her proper maintenance and support.

With the jurisdictional questions conceded by the defendant, the question to be determined is the appropriate amount to provide for the proper maintenance and support of the plaintiff.

Part of the defendant’s defence of the proceeding was that he had a competing financial need on the basis that he ‘carries an injury’ and has a mortgage. As a result of the defendant’s affidavit evidence compared to his oral evidence, the details of which are set out in these reasons, ultimately the defendant informed the Court midway through the trial that he no longer pursued that defence.

Applicable legislation and principles

The plaintiff seeks provision from the estate of the deceased, pursuant to Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) (‘the Act’), as amended by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Succession and Surrogacy) Act 2014.[1]
[1]Justice Legislation Amendment (Succession and Surrogacy) Act 2014, s 2(1); Victoria Government Gazette S4000,…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Brimelow v Alampi

Details

AGLC: Brimelow v Alampi [2016] VSC 135
Case: [2016] VSC 135
Decision Date: 8 April 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Brimelow v Alampi, the deceased, Mr. Brimelow, left no will, resulting in a dispute over the distribution of his estate between his adult daughter, Ms. Alampi, and his wife. The wife, as the administrator of the estate, contested the daughter's claim for a share of the estate. The dispute was adjudicated in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The central issue before the court was the extent of the daughter's entitlement to a share of the estate, considering the absence of a will and the statutory provisions under the Justice Legislation Amendment (Succession and Surrogacy) Act 2014 and the Administration and Probate Act 1958.

The court had to determine the quantum of the daughter's entitlement under the statutory framework, which provides for the distribution of an intestate's estate to family members. The wife acknowledged a moral obligation to support the daughter but argued against the statutory entitlement. The court examined the relevant statutory provisions to ascertain the appropriate share for the daughter, balancing the statutory rights and the moral obligations. It found that the statutory provisions clearly outline the rights of the deceased's children in the absence of a will, and these statutory rights must be upheld.

The court concluded that Ms. Alampi was entitled to a share of the estate as per the statutory framework. It determined that the wife, as the administrator, was obligated to distribute the estate according to the statutory provisions. The specific quantum of the share was subject to further assessment, but the court established the daughter's entitlement in principle. The court ordered that the estate be distributed according to the statutory provisions, with further assessment of the quantum to be conducted in subsequent proceedings.

Orders