DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Bowman and Inwood v Ba-Che [2010] QDC 271
PARTIES:
SHIRLEY JOY BOWMAN AND JOHN EDWARD INWOOD
v.
LARRY JAMES BA-CHE
DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Application for Criminal Compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:
Beenleigh District Court
DELIVERED ON:
31 May 2010
DELIVERED AT:
Beenleigh
HEARING DATE:
31 May 2010
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
Order that the respondent Larry James Ba-Che pay the applicant Shirley Joy Bowman the sum of $8,250.00
Order that the respondent Larry James Ba-Che pay the applicant John Edward Inwood the sum of $21,000.00.
CATCHWORDS:
Application – Criminal Compensation – Serious Assault – Assault occasioning bodily harm whilst armed - Bruising – mental or nervous shock
LEGISLATION:
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld)
CASES:
Kennedy v Faafeu [2010] QDC 21
Paterson v Chand and Chand [2008] QDC 214
RMC v. NAC [2009] QSC 149SOLICITORS:
Peter Saggers, Howden Saggers for the applicants.
No appearance for the respondent.
Introduction
HIS HONOUR: The proceedings before me today are two criminal compensation applications, Shirley Joy Bowman against Larry James Ba-Che and John Edward Inwood against Larry James Ba-Che. Both injuries occurred as a result of the one event (although with different charges relating to each of the two complainant/applicants) and it is convenient to deliver these reasons as a single set of reasons although, of course, dealing separately with matters relating to each of the applicants.
The respondent, Larry James Ba-Che, has not appeared before me this morning. In respect of the applicant Shirley Joy Bowman he pleaded guilty to one count of serious assault and was sentenced by me to 100 hours community service which, upon further application, was revoked (on 1 February 2008) and a prison sentence of three months, wholly suspended, with an operational period of 18 months imposed in substitution.
In respect of the applicant John Inwood the respondent pleaded guilty to one count of assault occasioning bodily harm whilst armed and was sentenced by me to 100 hours community service. Both the sentences in respect of the applicant Shirley Bowman and the applicant John Inwood occurred in the Beenleigh District Court on 5 June 2007.
Similarly to the outcome of the matters involving Ms Bowman, Mr Ba-Che was re-sentenced upon an application to revoke the community service order which proceeded before me on 1 February 2008 and was sentenced to three months, wholly suspended, with an operational period of 18 months.
Facts
The incident occurred on 6 September 2006. The applicant Shirley Bowman was then 61 years old and was the de facto wife of the applicant John Inwood who was then 62 years old. The respondent was their neighbour at the time of the incident.
On 6 September 2006 the respondent walked into the front yard of the home of the two applicants armed with a wooden pole which was the wooden mount for a beach umbrella. The respondent yelled, "You all stand aside. The police are coming and I want all of you to stay inside. I'm ready for them."
The respondent…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Bowman and Inwood v Ba-Che and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] QDC 271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicants' injuries met the criteria for criminal injuries compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2004. The applicants sought compensation for both physical injuries and psychological trauma. The court had to determine whether the physical injuries, which included bruising, warranted compensation and whether the applicants were entitled to compensation for the psychological trauma they experienced.
The court found that the applicants' claims for compensation were valid. The court held that the bruising suffered by the applicants qualified as bodily harm for the purposes of the Act. Additionally, the court accepted that the applicants had experienced psychological trauma as a result of the assault, which entitled them to compensation under the Act. Consequently, the court ordered the respondent to pay the applicants compensation. Shirley Joy Bowman was awarded $8,250.00, and John Edward Inwood was awarded $21,000.00.
Orders
Orders of the court
Order that the respondent Larry James Ba-Che pay the applicant Shirley Joy Bowman the sum of $8,250.00
Order that the respondent Larry James Ba-Che pay the applicant John Edward Inwood the sum of $21,000.00.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.