Border Morning Mail v Hansen

Case [1989] NSWCA 23

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: BORDER MORNING MAIL v HANSEN [1989] NSWCA 23
Decision date: 20 March 1989

See Attachment (PDF)

Details
AGLC
Border Morning Mail v Hansen [1989] NSWCA 23
Case
[1989] NSWCA 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The New South Wales Court of Appeal heard an appeal concerning a defamation action brought by Mr. Hansen against the Border Morning Mail. The dispute arose from an article published by the newspaper which Mr. Hansen alleged was defamatory.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the published article was capable of bearing a defamatory meaning, and if so, whether it was in fact defamatory of Mr. Hansen. The appeal also concerned the application of the defence of qualified privilege.

The Court analysed the ordinary meaning of the words published in the article, considering how a reasonable reader would have understood them. It applied established principles of defamation law regarding the imputation of discreditable conduct or characteristics. The Court found that the article was capable of bearing a defamatory meaning and that the defence of qualified privilege was not made out in the circumstances. The appeal was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.