-
Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd
[1988] FCA 364
Citation 1
(Para 6)
…d · the defendant’s refusal, to accept written offer(s) of compromise made by the plaintiffs, was imprudent. [7] Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397, 401. [8] Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685, 693. Properly advised – Chances of Success…
-
Bradbury and Lander (No. 3)
[2019] FamCA 152
Citation 2
(Para 5)
…refusal of an offer to compromise and commencing a proceeding in wilful disregard of known facts.[6] [6] Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225, 233.…
-
BHP Billiton Ltd v Parker
[2012] SASCFC 73
Citation 3
(Para 2)
…ts, subject to the provisions of that section and subject to the District Court Civil Rules 2006 (SA) (‘the Rules’).[3] [3] BHP Billiton v Parker (2012) 113 SASR 206 at [261] .…
-
Piscopo v Not Lawyers
[2008] FCA 1907
Citation 4
(Para 6)
…er(s) of compromise made by the plaintiffs, was imprudent. [7] Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397, 401. [8] Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685, 693. Properly advised – Chances of Success…
-
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2)
[2005] VSCA 298
Citation 5
(Para 20)
…e the offer was made, and which bear upon the offer and its rejection.[19] [18] Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty ltd v Workcover Authority (Vic) (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 at [19]. [19] Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351.…
-
Morris v McEwen
[2005] SASC 284
Citation 6
…ants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397; Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685; Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93; Morris v McEwen (2005) 92 SASR 281; Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 201 ALR 618; McKerlie v State of New South Wale…
-
Carey-Hazell v Getz Bros & Co (Aust) Pty Ltd
[2004] FCA 1140
Citation 7
(Para 6)
…d Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397, 401. [8] Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685, 693. Properly advised – Chances of Success…
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] FCA 1800
Citation 8
(Para 19)
…in effect, invites an opponent to capitulate.[17] [17] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 201 ALR 618 at [60]-[61]; McKerlie v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2000] NSWSC 1159.…
-
McKerlie v State of New South Wales (No 2)
[2000] NSWSC 1159
Citation 9
(Para 19)
…on and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 201 ALR 618 at [60]-[61]; McKerlie v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2000] NSWSC 1159.…
-
Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland
[2000] FCA 1106
Citation 10
(Para 6)
…In the circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs seek a special order on three bases, namely: · the defendant, properly advised, should have known that it had no chance of success;[7] · the defendant made (and persisted with) allegations, in both its Defence and Counterclaim, which ought never to h…
-
Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd
[1991] APO 20
Citation 11
(Para 5)
…ought never to have been made, an imprudent refusal of an offer to compromise and commencing a proceeding in wilful disregard of known facts.[6] [6] Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225, 233.…
-
Aljade and MKIC v OCBC
[2004] VSC 351
Citation 12
(Para 20)
…d its rejection.[19] [18] Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty ltd v Workcover Authority (Vic) (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 at [19]. [19] Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351.…
-
Bonnin v TAL Life Ltd
[2013] SADC 98
Citation 13
(Para 1)
…order that the defendant pays their costs of action as between solicitor and client or upon the basis of an indemnity (‘special order’).[2] [1] [2013] SADC 98. [2] District Court Civil Rules 6R 264(5). Costs Generally…
-
Parker v BHP Billiton Limited (No 2)
[2011] SADC 175
Citation 14
(Para 2)
…d discretion as to costs, subject to the provisions of that section and subject to the District Court Civil Rules 2006 (SA) (‘the Rules’).[3] [3] BHP Billiton v Parker (2012) 113 SASR 206 at [261] .…