Birta v Camperdown Childcare Centre

Link copied
Case Copied 31 min read
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 
CITATION: Birta v Camperdown Childcare Centre [2024] NSWPIC 385
APPLICANT: Regina Birta
RESPONDENT: Camperdown Childcare Centre
MEMBER: Fiona Seaton
DATE OF DECISION: 18 July 2024
CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS COMPENSATION - Workers Compensation Act 1987; Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; alleged hearing loss due to noise exposure working as a chef; claim for hearing aids; permanent impairment; whether claim was brought within time; applicant was employed by the respondent in employment to the nature of which the injury, noise induced hearing loss, is due; Held – applicant brought her claim within time; matter remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to assess the degree of permanent impairment; the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids to the applicant is reasonably necessary as a result of noise induced hearing loss; the injury has materially contributed to the need for hearing aids; respondent to pay the costs of the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids in accordance with the applicable Workers Compensation (Hearing Aid Fees) Order.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

The Commission determines:

1. The applicant was employed by the respondent in employment to the nature of which the injury of industrial deafness is due for the purposes of s 17(a)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 with deemed date of injury 1 November 1994.

2. The applicant became aware and made her claim for compensation within the time prescribed by s 261 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998.

3. The matter is remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor pursuant to s 321 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 for assessment as follows:

(a)    Date of injury: 1 November 1994 (deemed);

(b)    Body systems/parts: permanent binaural hearing loss (Noisy employment hearing loss), and

(c)    Method of assessment: Table of Disabilities.

4.     The documents to be referred to the Medical Assessor are:

(a)    the Application to Resolve a Dispute and attached documents, and

(b)    the respondent’s Reply and attached documents.

5. The respondent is to pay the cost of the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids pursuant to s 60 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in accordance with the applicable Workers Compensation (Hearing Aid Fees) Order.

STATEMENT OF REASONS

BACKGROUND

  1. The applicant Ms Regina Birta was employed for 24 years as a chef. Her last employer was the Camperdown Childcare Centre (the respondent) and the deemed date of injury is 1 November 1994. The applicant alleges she sustained a hearing loss injury due to loud noise during her employment with the respondent.

  2. The applicant claims medical and related expenses for the costs associated with the supply and fitting of hearing aids in accordance with the Workers Compensation (Hearing Aid Fees) Order 2024 and lump sum compensation for permanent impairment for 9.34% binaural hearing loss.

  3. The respondent issued a notice under s 78 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) on 7 December 2023 disputing…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Birta v Camperdown Childcare Centre and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWPIC 385
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Birta v Camperdown Childcare Centre, the applicant, Birta, sought compensation for alleged hearing loss due to noise exposure during her employment as a chef. The dispute was heard in the Workers Compensation Court of Victoria. The central issue before the court was whether Birta's claim was brought within the requisite time and if the injury she sustained materially contributed to her need for hearing aids. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids were reasonably necessary as a result of her noise-induced hearing loss.

The court examined the statutory framework, specifically the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998. It was established that Birta's claim was indeed brought within the necessary timeframe. The court also found that the injury she sustained had materially contributed to her need for hearing aids. The court determined that the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids were reasonably necessary as a direct result of her hearing loss. The court remitted the matter to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to evaluate the degree of permanent impairment.

The court ruled that Birta's claim was brought within the requisite time and that the injury materially contributed to her need for hearing aids. The court ordered that the respondent, Camperdown Childcare Centre, must pay for the supply and fitting of binaural hearing aids in accordance with the applicable Workers Compensation (Hearing Aid Fees) Order. This decision ensures that Birta receives the necessary compensation for her noise-induced hearing loss and related medical requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.