BIELBY

Case [2023] QCAT 345


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

BIELBY [2023] QCAT 345

PARTIES:

In an application about matters concerning Genevieve Margaret Bielby

APPLICATION NO:

GAA1932-23

MATTER TYPE:

Guardianship and administration matters for adults

DECISION DATE:

20 June 2023

REASONS DATE:

8 September 2023

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Kanowski

ORDER:

Leave is granted to Genevieve Margaret Bielby to be legally represented at the hearing of application GAA1932-23.

CATCHWORDS:

PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS – PARTIES AND REPRESENTATION – LEGAL REPRESENTATION – GENERALLY – where principal sought orders against a former attorney – where principal sought leave to be legally represented – whether leave should be granted

Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld), s 124(1)

Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld), s 85, s 109A(2), s 110(4), s 122

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 43

MJ v MET & Ors [2022] QCATA 180

Xtreme First Impressions Pty Ltd v Miller [2023] QCAT 31

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to section 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (‘QCAT Act’)

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. Mrs Bielby[1] brought an application in the tribunal which was listed for hearing on 23 June 2023. Before the hearing, she applied for leave to be legally represented. On 20 June 2023 I decided to grant leave. Mrs Bielby’s former attorney, Rosaline Devi Miller, has requested reasons for that decision, which I now provide.

    [1]The prohibition on identifying the ‘adult’ in a proceeding governed by the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld), in s 114A(2), does not apply after the adult dies: s 114A(3)(b). Mrs Bielby has died since the decision was made.

Background

  1. Mrs Bielby appointed Mrs Miller her attorney under an enduring power of attorney made in December 2019 and revoked in October 2022.

  2. In February 2023 Mrs Bielby applied to the tribunal for orders under section 122 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld) (‘Powers of Attorney Act’) for Mrs Miller to provide financial records for the period she was attorney. The records sought included ones relating to the sale of a real property owned by Mrs Bielby. Mrs Bielby contended that not all funds had been accounted for by Mrs Miller.

  3. Mrs Bielby’s application was prepared by a community legal service, the Caxton Legal Centre. Mrs Bielby sought to be represented by that service at the hearing of her application.

  4. Although orders were sought against Mrs Miller, she was not automatically a party to the proceeding. Persons entitled to participate in a proceeding for an order under the Powers of Attorney Act are ‘a person joined as a party to a proceeding … or a person the court considers an interested person …’.[2] The reference to the court is to be read as a reference to the tribunal when the application has been brought in the tribunal rather than the Supreme Court.[3] Various procedural provisions in the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) (‘Guardianship…

Continue reading BIELBY

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
BIELBY [2023] QCAT 345
Case
[2023] QCAT 345
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Genevieve Margaret Bielby, the plaintiff, filed an application against her former attorney, seeking orders against them. The case was heard in the relevant state court, where Bielby requested permission to be legally represented during the hearing of application GAA1932-23. The court was required to determine whether Bielby should be granted leave to be legally represented by a lawyer.

The primary issue before the court was whether Bielby should be permitted to engage legal representation in the proceedings. This involved assessing the necessity and appropriateness of legal representation for Bielby in the context of the application. The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the complexity of the issues and the potential impact on Bielby's ability to effectively present her case.

The court found that it was appropriate for Bielby to be legally represented during the hearing of the application. The court reasoned that given the nature of the application and the potential implications for Bielby, legal representation would assist in ensuring that her rights were adequately protected and that the proceedings were conducted fairly. Consequently, the court granted leave for Bielby to be legally represented at the hearing of application GAA1932-23.

In conclusion, the court granted Genevieve Margaret Bielby leave to be legally represented at the hearing of application GAA1932-23, recognising the importance of legal representation in ensuring a fair and effective presentation of her case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Leave is granted to Genevieve Margaret Bielby to be legally represented at the hearing of application GAA1932-23.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.