BFI16 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2019] FCCA 731
•29 March 2019
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BFI16 v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR | [2019] FCCA 731 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Protection visa – students apply for Protection visas following expiry of Student visas and rejection of applications for Graduate visas – applicants’ claim for protection grounded on claim to be member of particular social group, being homosexuals in Pakistan – applicants found not to be credible witnesses and claims found to be implausible – delay in applying for visas – applicable principles – whether Tribunal’s manner of consideration of claims entailed jurisdictional error – whether affected by unreasonableness – judicial review of application grounded upon challenge to fact finding by Tribunal – distinguished from application grounded upon challenge to exercise of statutory discretionary power – judicial review by evaluation of quality of Tribunal’s decision based upon evidence and submissions made to it – whether Tribunal failed to consider claims or evidence – whether finding of legal unreasonableness could properly be reached by a process of aggregation of impugned facts, none of which had been individually found to be unreasonable, irrational nor illogical – whether claim considered – whether no evidence for finding of fact – whether impugned finding a precondition to the exercise of jurisdiction or a critical step in ultimate decision – applications dismissed. |
| Applicant: | BFI16 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | MLG 1073 of 2016 |
| Judgment of: | Judge A Kelly |
| Hearing date: | 2 February 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 2 February 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 29 March 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant in proceedings MLG 1073/2016 and proceedings MLG 1077/2016: | Mr Moore |
| Solicitors for the Applicant in proceedings MLG 1073/2016 and proceedings MLG 1077/2016: | Asylum Seeker Resource Centre |
| Counsel for the Respondent in proceedings MLG 1073/2016 and proceedings MLG 1077/2016: | Mr Hosking |
| Solicitors for the Respondent in proceedings MLG 1073/2016 and proceedings MLG 1077/2016: | Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
The name of the first respondent be amended in the title of the proceeding to Minister for Home Affairs.
The amended application filed on 5 January 2018 be dismissed.
The first respondent file and serve any submissions on costs within 7 days.
The applicant file and serve any submissions on costs within 14 days.
The question of costs be decided on the papers.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLG 1073 of 2016
| BFI16 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By amended applications each filed on 5 January 2018, applicants in related proceedings[1] sought judicial review of decisions made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) on 29 April 2016 affirming decisions of a delegate of the first respondent (Minister) to refuse to grant them Protection (Class XA) visas pursuant to par 65(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act). By consent those applications were heard together. The applicants, who are Pakistani citizens, were born in Sahiwal and Lahore, Punjab Province, and are aged 28 and 32 years respectively. Each of the applicants speak English and Urdu. Each had departed Pakistan legally; arriving in Australia in December 2009 and July 2009 upon Subclass 572 Student visas so as to study engineering and accounting respectively.
[1] In proceedings MLG 1073 and MLG 1077 of 2016.
By reasons for judgment in proceeding MLG 1077 of 2016, published this day, I made orders dismissing that application for judicial review: [2019] FCCA 730. Those reasons are incorporated in these reasons for judgment and explain why I have concluded that this application should also be dismissed.
I certify that the preceding two (2) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge A Kelly
Date: 29 March 2019.