JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CRIMINAL
CITATION: BARNETT -v- SKEHAN [2021] WASC 53
CORAM: MCGRATH J
HEARD: 25 FEBRUARY 2021
DELIVERED : 5 MARCH 2021
FILE NO/S: SJA 1091 of 2020
BETWEEN: TANYA LESLYE BARNETT
Appellant
AND
DWAYNE SKEHAN
Respondent
ON APPEAL FROM:
Jurisdiction : MAGISTRATES COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Coram: MAGISTRATE TAVENER
File Number : MI 9266 of 2020
Catchwords:
Criminal law - Appeal against sentence - Creating a false belief - Whether sentence manifestly excessive - Express error of law - Punishment for uncharged acts
Legislation:
Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), s 14(2)
Criminal Code (WA), s 171(1) and s 171(2)
Sentencing Act 1995 (WA), s 6(1), s 6(2), s 6(4), s 9AA, s 39(2), s 39(3), s 76(1) and s 76(2)
Result:
Leave to appeal on grounds 1 and 2 refused
Appeal dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| Appellant | : | Ms M J Ajduk |
| Respondent | : | Ms G N Beggs |
Solicitors:
| Appellant | : | Legal Aid WA |
| Respondent | : | Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) |
Cases referred to in decision:
Ashford v The State of Western Australia [No 2] [2016] WASCA 222
Cartwright v The State of Western Australia [2010] WASCA 4
Chan v The Queen (1989) 38 A Crim R 337
Jaw v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 7
Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; (1999) 195 CLR 665
Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357
Munda v The State of Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600
R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383
Rhatigan v Forbes [2009] WASC 368
Roberts v The State of Western Australia [2014] WASCA 239
Samuels v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 193; (2005) 30 WAR 473
MCGRATH J:
The appellant was convicted, upon her own plea, of one offence of creating a false belief contrary to s 171(2) of the Criminal Code (WA). The learned magistrate imposed a 7 month term of imprisonment conditionally suspended for 9 months. The appellant now seeks leave to appeal the sentence on two grounds. Firstly, the appellant contends that the learned magistrate erred in law by treating uncharged acts as separate offences for sentencing purposes and secondly, that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive.
For the following reasons, I have determined that leave to appeal is not granted and the appeal is dismissed.
In these reasons for decision, I will consider the following:
1.The Magistrates Court proceedings.
2.The grounds of appeal.
3.An assessment of the merits of the appeal.
The Magistrates Court proceedings
The prosecution notice lodged on 14 August 2020 pleaded that on 4 July 2020 the appellant unlawfully made an emergency call with the intention of creating a false belief or suspicion, namely a belief or suspicion that human safety was or may have been endangered, contrary to s 171(2) of the Criminal Code.[1]
[1] Prosecution notice lodged 14 August 2020,…
Continue reading Barnett v Skehan
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Barnett v Skehan [2021] WASC 53
- Case
- [2021] WASC 53
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.