FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BALCOMB & DALEY | [2016] FCCA 1635 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Where Applicant seeks a declaration pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 that she and the Respondent were in a de-facto relationship – held parties in a de facto relationship. |
| Legislation: Evidence Act 1995, s.128 Family Law Act 1975, ss.90RD, 90RF, 4AA |
| Jonah & White [2012] FamCAFC 200 Jonah v White [2011] FamCA 221 JPDJ v DADJ [2005] FMCAfam 86 Keene & Scofield (No.2) [2013] FCCA 1107 Sinclair & Whittaker (2013) FLC 93-551 Nelson v Nelson [1995] HCA 25 Moby & Schutter (2010) FLC 93-447 |
| Applicant: | MS BALCOMB |
| Respondent: | MR DALEY |
| File Number: | MLC 363 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Jones |
| Hearing dates: | 22, 23 & 24 February 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 13 April 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 1 July 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Ms Sweet |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Twigg Family Law |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms Smallwood |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Pearsons Lawyers |
ORDERS
That pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Court declares that a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and the Respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013.
The proceedings are listed for mention at 9:30am on 6 July 2016.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Balcomb & Daley is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLC 363 of 2015
| MS BALCOMB |
Applicant
And
| MR DALEY |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an application filed on 20 January 2015 by Ms Balcomb (“the Applicant”), seeking a declaration that pursuant to s.90RD(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”), a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and Mr Daley (“the Respondent”) from about late 2001 until on or about 15 October 2013, or such date as determined by the Court.
The Respondent seeks that the application be dismissed.
The law
Statutory provisions
Section 90RF of the Act provides:
Any party to the primary proceedings may apply for a section 90RD declaration.
Section 90RD of the Act provides:
(1) If:
(a) an application is made for an order under section 90SE, 90SG or 90SM, or a declaration under section 90SL; and
(b) a claim is made, in support of the application, that a de facto relationship existed between the applicant and another person;
the court may, for the purposes of those proceedings (the primary proceedings), declare that a de facto relationship existed, or never existed, between those 2 persons.
(2) A declaration under subsection (1) of the existence of a de facto relationship may also declare any or all of the following:
(a) the period, or periods, of the de facto relationship for the purposes of paragraph 90SB(a);
(b) whether there is a child of the de facto relationship;
(c) whether one of the parties to the de facto relationship made substantial contributions of a…
Continue reading Balcomb and Daley
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Balcomb and Daley [2013] FCCA 1107
- Case
- [2016] FCCA 1635
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the evidence established the existence of a de facto relationship between the parties for the period claimed by the applicant, specifically from late 2001 until 15 October 2013, pursuant to section 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
The Court considered the evidence presented and, applying the criteria for establishing a de facto relationship under the *Family Law Act*, found that a de facto relationship did indeed exist between the applicant and the respondent from late 2001 up to and including 15 October 2013.
Consequently, the Court made orders declaring that a de facto relationship existed between the applicant and the respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013. The proceedings were then listed for mention on 6 July 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Court declares that a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and the Respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013.
2.
The proceedings are listed for mention at 9:30am on 6 July 2016.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.