Balcomb and Daley

Case [2016] FCCA 1635


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BALCOMB & DALEY [2016] FCCA 1635
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Where Applicant seeks a declaration pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 that she and the Respondent were in a de-facto relationship – held parties in a de facto relationship.

Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995, s.128

Family Law Act 1975, ss.90RD, 90RF, 4AA

Jonah & White [2012] FamCAFC 200
Jonah v White [2011] FamCA 221
JPDJ v DADJ [2005] FMCAfam 86
Keene & Scofield (No.2) [2013] FCCA 1107
Sinclair & Whittaker (2013) FLC 93-551
Nelson v Nelson [1995] HCA 25
Moby & Schutter (2010) FLC 93-447
Applicant: MS BALCOMB
Respondent: MR DALEY
File Number: MLC 363 of 2015
Judgment of: Judge Jones
Hearing dates: 22, 23 & 24 February 2016
Date of Last Submission: 13 April 2016
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 1 July 2016

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Sweet
Solicitors for the Applicant: Twigg Family Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Smallwood
Solicitors for the Respondent: Pearsons Lawyers

ORDERS

  1. That pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Court declares that a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and the Respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013.

  2. The proceedings are listed for mention at 9:30am on 6 July 2016.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Balcomb & Daley is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT MELBOURNE

MLC 363 of 2015

MS BALCOMB

Applicant

And

MR DALEY

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This is an application filed on 20 January 2015 by Ms Balcomb (“the Applicant”), seeking a declaration that pursuant to s.90RD(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”), a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and Mr Daley (“the Respondent”) from about late 2001 until on or about 15 October 2013, or such date as determined by the Court.

  2. The Respondent seeks that the application be dismissed.

The law

Statutory provisions

  1. Section 90RF of the Act provides:

    Any party to the primary proceedings may apply for a section 90RD declaration.

  2. Section 90RD of the Act provides:

    (1)     If:

    (a)     an application is made for an order under section 90SE, 90SG or 90SM, or a declaration under section 90SL; and

    (b)     a claim is made, in support of the application, that a de facto relationship existed between the applicant and another person;

    the court may, for the purposes of those proceedings (the primary proceedings), declare that a de facto relationship existed, or never existed, between those 2 persons.

    (2) A declaration under subsection (1) of the existence of a de facto relationship may also declare any or all of the following:

    (a)     the period, or periods, of the de facto relationship for the purposes of paragraph 90SB(a);

    (b)     whether there is a child of the de facto relationship;

    (c)      whether one of the parties to the de facto relationship made substantial contributions of a…

Continue reading Balcomb and Daley

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Balcomb and Daley [2013] FCCA 1107
Case
[2016] FCCA 1635
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Balcomb and Daley*, heard before Judge Jones, the applicant sought a declaration that a de facto relationship existed with the respondent. The core of the dispute concerned the duration of this alleged de facto relationship, with the applicant asserting it commenced in late 2001 and concluded on 15 October 2013.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the evidence established the existence of a de facto relationship between the parties for the period claimed by the applicant, specifically from late 2001 until 15 October 2013, pursuant to section 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).

The Court considered the evidence presented and, applying the criteria for establishing a de facto relationship under the *Family Law Act*, found that a de facto relationship did indeed exist between the applicant and the respondent from late 2001 up to and including 15 October 2013.

Consequently, the Court made orders declaring that a de facto relationship existed between the applicant and the respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013. The proceedings were then listed for mention on 6 July 2016.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That pursuant to s.90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Court declares that a de facto relationship existed between the Applicant and the Respondent from late 2001 to 15 October 2013.

2.

The proceedings are listed for mention at 9:30am on 6 July 2016.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.