FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BADAWI & BADAWI | [2016] FamCA 804 |
| FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY SETTLEMENT – Application by the husband under section 79A(1)(a) to set aside final consent orders – Whether the husband was under duress signing the consent orders – Whether there was a suppression of evidence – Whether the then Federal Magistrate Court Rules 2001 (Cth) were not complied with – Whether the parties’ solicitors failed in their duties – Whether the representation of the husband was perverse or amounted to no representation at all per In the marriage of Clifton and Stuart (1991) FLC 92-194 – Whether the husband was not competent to conduct litigation without a case guardian due to his mental health – Where the Court finds that no ground has been established under section 79A(1)(a) – Where the Court would not have found a miscarriage of justice had occurred – Where the Court would not have exercised its discretion to set aside the consent orders – Application dismissed. |
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140(2)(c)
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79A(1)(a), 79, 114(2)(b) Federal Magistrate Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 4.03, 11.08, 24.02 |
Birkbeck & Birkbeck (1970) 16 FLR 78
Crescendo Management Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 19 NSWLR 40
Gebert & Gebert (1990) FLC 92-137
Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84
Holland & Holland (1982) FLC 91-243
Howard v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] HCA 21
In the marriage of Clifton and Stuart (1991) FLC 92-194
In the marriage of Florie (1988) FLC 91-913
In the marriage of Rohde (1984) FLC 91-592
In the marriage of Simpson and Hamlin (1984) FLC 91-576
Lane & Lane [2016] FamCAFC 53
Law Society of New South Wales v Harvey [1976] 2 NSWLR 154
Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449
Redman & Redman [2013] FamCAFC 183
Saintclaire & Saintclaire (2015) FLC 93-684
Saleeby & Moon [2015] FamCA 43
SH and DH (2003) FLC 93-164
University of Wollongong v Metwally(No. 2) (1985) 60 ALR 68
| APPLICANT: | Mr Badawi |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Badawi |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 3146 | of | 2008 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 21 September 2016 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | McClelland J |
| HEARING DATE: | 5 - 6 May 2016; 3 June 2016 and by way of written submissions |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Reid |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | M Duncan & Associates |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Paterson |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Jack Rigg Solicitors |
Orders
The husband’s Initiating Application filed 24 November 2014 is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Badawi & Badawi has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a…
Continue reading Badawi and Badawi
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Badawi and Badawi [2016] FamCA 804
- Case
- [2016] FamCA 804
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the husband's Initiating Application, filed on 24 November 2014, should be dismissed. This implies a determination regarding the validity, timeliness, or appropriateness of the application as presented.
McClelland J ordered the dismissal of the husband's Initiating Application filed on 24 November 2014. The court's reasoning for this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided extract, but the outcome is a clear rejection of the husband's application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The husband’s Initiating Application filed 24 November 2014 is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.